I'm almost done with my 130 final. Now I can start rereading
Anscomb for my paper. Wittgenstein's assertion is that you can
hold a false belief without having made a mistake. I don't see what the
problem is or how this implies any kind of idealism. You can
speak falsely without lying, but the fact that you weren't lying
doesn't make whatever you said true. But I can't make that last 6 pages.
Tue Jun 13 2000 11:19:
Disclaimer: My mother does not own a Macintosh.
