On the other hand, fiction is teleological, and fictional
characters are puppets. Declaring romantic destiny between two characters is no more
difficult than saying how tall they are. You just have to be careful
not to contradict your statement by the characters' words or actions.
"Explain why Ariel and Jenny aren't together" annoyed me, perhaps
unfairly, because the need for an explanation reminded me of this
assumption I dislike. I mentioned this earlier in commentary, and also mentioned
that I'd decided to include an explanation if I could think of one
that wasn't a cliche. This is what I came up with: the One True
Pairing phenomenon is real, but it's a curse. Any two parties so affected are the
Keymaster and Gatekeeper of a door that opens into stark, existential
horror.
This was kind of inspired by a story idea (I don't remember if I
came up with this or read it somewhere) where an intelligence
augmentation technique is invented, but people who use it too much
become listless and nihilistic because they can see the true nature of
the universe unfiltered by the usual coping mechanisms. There's no
plot there, which gives it the hallmarks of a story idea I came up
with, but I'm not laying claim to it.
On the off chance that you are really really bothered by this shift
in the rules of the book's universe, here's an easy out. Ariel is an
unreliable narrator! He's writing this letter to distract Krakowski as
much as to communicate with Jenny. So he exaggerated something that
actually happened. What happens in "Found Objects" is compatible
with either interpretation of Ariel's letter.
(But it totally happened the way Ariel says.)
Why? Because it's really mean to Ariel, given what happens
immediately afterwards. But without that line, Ariel is being
incredibly cruel to Jenny. So I included that line, and that was the
last time I ever felt bad about being mean to Ariel.
Which Ariel is real? That's like asking which Curic is real. Both Curics are real, and both Ariels are fake. The "real life sections", as much as the blog posts, are written by Ariel to convey a certain impression to you. What you read as "Jenny" is actually a story Ariel tells you about Jenny, and if you read "Found Objects" you'll see Jenny telling a different story.
Jenny's unique in that she has an infinite number of names. She takes on new identities as a hobby. In the chapter 30 flashback, she and Ariel discover that "Jenny" and "Ariel" are themselves forms of cosplay, identities just as artificial as "Skewer Sue". This is the closest they'll come to realizing that they're fictional characters.
(n.b. even Jenny's cosplay identity has two names--Ariel mistakes her Skewer Sue costume for a Taikan-Victory costume)
The Long Way Around showed up in the Twitter feeds back in part one. It'll come up again, and Af be Hui herself will make an appearance, but the importance of this game to its creator and to Ariel is mostly being saved for a sequel. Suffice to say it's a Minecraft-like game about a man who gets fucked over by his government and dies alone on a strange planet. And if you like hunting around for clues, chapter 16 shows what the sonnet's last line refers to.
The train we call Part Three is just getting started on its rampage down the track. Destination: the end of the book. Don't miss next week's installment, when Ariel will say, "Your gender-neutral use of 'men' isn't nearly as endearing as you think it is."
Image credits: Flickr user frostnova, NASA, Alan Shepard.
(9) Tue Jun 19 2012 09:31 Constellation Games Author Commentary #30: "Constellation 'Shipping":
Here it is: the weird chapter. The chapter that takes what was
fairly realistic SF and does I don't know what to it. Why? Because, like
Her, I despise being dull. I despise it enough to risk pulling a Battlestar Galactica and ruining the
reader's experience of the entire book. Amazingly, the only major complaints I've gotten so far came from
writing group in the second draft, saying that the emotional tone of
what came before was never as powerful as this. But if you want to
complain, you're welcome to do so.
As you may have gathered from the text, I don't like the idea that
certain fictional characters "belong" together in a teleological
sense, an assumption that underlies a lot of art and fandom. I think
it's lazy character development and I think it encourages people to
think that way about real life, where it's absolutely false.
Speaking of teleology, what happens to Ariel when he goes to see
Tammy is me directly punishing him for lying to her. The story could
conceivably have gone differently, with a Ariel/Tammy reconciliation,
but what Ariel says in his letter to Jenny makes that almost
impossible dramatically.

