I guess it would only be a Liar's Paradox if the open source guidelines
said that an open source license could contain no false statements.
Thu Jun 15 2000 05:51:
I just realized that the Liar's Paradox could be embodied in a software
license. You'd have a license that met all the open source guidelines
but which said "This is not an open source license." (That's an Empirical Liar, by the way) Dan says that
this isn't a Liar Paradox, it's just lying. Maybe. But what would be
the legal status of such a license?