Mon Oct 15 2007 10:04:
"Schroeder's fanaticism is ludicrous, and Lucy's love is wasted." (q.v.) Caution: It's the Wall Street Journal. On the other hand, it's Bill Watterson.
Mon Oct 15 2007 10:04:
"Schroeder's fanaticism is ludicrous, and Lucy's love is wasted." (q.v.) Caution: It's the Wall Street Journal. On the other hand, it's Bill Watterson.
However, the waiter did offer us the ability to poutine-ize our fries. Mon Oct 15 2007 20:46 Lost in Non-Translation:
The Americans solicited advice on where to eat dinner. We were intrigued by the "smoked meat" restaurant. A whole cuisine devoted to smoked meat? Like barbecue? Yes, but not so sauce-heavy. We were intrigued! We went to the restaurant. It was a deli.
Mon Oct 15 2007 21:31:
"You know the joke about how all the superheroes are Jewish? Cause their names are Batman, Superman, Spiderman..."
"Well, you know who's not Jewish. Robin the Goy Wonder."
Anonymous commenter on Zack's Livejournal says to take a look at
Dwarf Fortress. I definitely think everyone should take a look at
Dwarf Fortress, but the roguelike part of DF is pretty lame. Instead I
would suggest Zack take a look at ADOM, which has most of Nethack's
fun features, few of the aggravations, and not many of the
second-order aggravations that come from fixing the first-order
aggravations.
Zack's complaints about Nethack:
I would like to see a roguelike that consistently applies the
real-world principle that you get better with practice. You start with
an inclination towards solving problems in certain ways, but you only
improve the skills you practice.
ADOM is a roguelike with a plot. You have to talk to people to get
quests. There are multiple endings. Pretty basic stuff, but it changes
the gameplay. The world feels a lot less static. There are a couple
things about the game world that actually happen over game time.
Nethack also has no character definition. The memorable characters
in Nethack are mainly memorable for inscrutability: the Oracle,
Izchak, Rodney. Characters in ADOM have approximately the depth of
console RPG characters: there's the old gladiator, the girl who lost
her dog, the baby dragon. Console RPG depth is not very deep, but it
feels more like a real world and less like a game.
What's the downside? Because ADOM is a roguelike, you die a
lot. When you die in a console RPG you go back to your last save, but
every time you die in ADOM you have to restart this moderately complex
plot, make a bunch of decisions about which plot levers you want to
try and pull this time, which characters you want to put into which
states. This problem gets worse as the plot gets richer. Nethack
sidesteps the whole thing by having no plot and no character
definition.
Is there a solution? @Play did a few
columns on a Japanese rogulike called Torneko No Daibouken
(tr. "Torneko's Huge-Ass Adventure"). Read
about its architecture as a Nethack player and it will seem very
weird but it's a nice synthesis of Roguelike death and CRPG
continuity. There's a CRPG metagame where you talk to people and build
up your magic items business, and a Roguelike game where you steal
magic items from the dungeon. When you play the Roguelike you start at
level 1, and the Roguelike continues until you leave the dungeon. Then
you play the CRPG for a while. Eventually you can take a couple of
useful items into the dungeon with you to make it easier.
In Torneko No Daibouken you have no real agency in the CRPG
portion. But you could put most of the plot into the CRPG, and make
your plot decisions persistent over a series of games. I'm still
thinking this out.
The solution is to have more special levels that are not all
aggravating in the same way. ADOM has a huge variety of levels:
different environments connected by a world map, and a large dungeon
that contains many special levels. SLASHEM has more special levels
than Nethack, but not enough. CRPG 'levels' are almost always
different from each other, both in terms of window dressing and in
terms of monsters. I'm seriously reevaluating CRPGs after playing
Earthbound. The only ones I'd played before were a pretty old crop:
Dragon Warrior, Ultima, and the original Final Fantasy.
The other part of the tedium is schlepping items around the
dungeon. This is not hard to fix with different mechanics: making it
possible to carry huge amounts (there's a spell for this in ADOM), or
making it unneccesary or impossible to carry lots of stuff (*Angband,
Diablo).
More later as I need to go to sleep.
Update: The promised "more".
(2) Mon Oct 15 2007 23:12 Notes on Notes Towards a Roguelike:
Zack wanted me to comment on his Notes Towards a
Roguelike, where he talks about his problems with Nethack. Nethack
does have serious problems, but some of them are coupled with the
things that make Nethack fun, so they can't just be ripped out.
![]() | Unless otherwise noted, all content licensed by Leonard Richardson under a Creative Commons License. |