But you can replace a generic verb with a fancy evocative verb that does the work of an adverb.
In fact, you can replace a whole clause (often including adverbs) with an evocative verb that conveys the same information.
Except when the generic verb is "said". Using fancy versions of "said" is "said-bookism", also considered undesirable.
And you can't use adverbs here either.
Hypothesis: by preventing you from describing the way someone says something, these rules force you to write dialogue that explains how it should be read.
vs.
(3) Sun Feb 21 2010 22:51 Guess The Verb! (It's "Said"):
This has bothered me for a little while. In general, it's considered undesirable to use too many adverbs in writing.
He
messily ate the sandwich.
He assaulted the sandwich.
He
walked aimlessly around wandered the room.
"Just as you wish," he
preened said.
"Just as you wish," he said
obsequiously
"Just as you wish, O most esteemèd lord."
"Well," he said, "if such is my lord's wish..."
- Comments:
Posted by Zack at Sun Feb 21 2010 23:25
I think you're right about said-bookisms, but yanno, too many elaborate locomotive verbs will empurple your prose just as well as too many modifiers. Also, make grief for translators into languages that have fewer elaborate locomotive verbs -- I'm informed that most Romance languages, for instance, do not place nearly as much focus on the manner of motion as English does. (I used to know the technical term for this but I can't remember it anymore.)
Posted by Leonard at Mon Feb 22 2010 09:13
Did-bookism?