Au Contraire, Mon Frère!

Schickele Mix Episode #70

Part of The Schickele Mix Online Fan Archive

Premiere
1994-12-10
“Peter, are you ready?”
Mais oui, mon ami

Listen

You can listen to this episode on the Internet Archive, and follow along using a transcript.

Listing

Transcript

[This is a machine-generated transcript, cleaned up and formatted as HTML. You can download the original as an .srt file.]

Approaching the 2 o'clock hour in Schickele Mix, but first, I must remind you, this is WLRE Huntsville, with offices and studios located on the campus, the University of Alabama, Huntsville. Schickele, are you ready? Me oui, mon ami. Here's the theme.
[No speech for 15s.]
Hello there, I'm Peter Schickele, and this is Schickele Mix, a program dedicated to the proposition that all musics are created equal. Or as Duke Ellington put it, if it sounds good, it is good.
Financial sustenance for this program is provided by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, and by this Au Courant radio station, where I'm provided with this really charming studio space. You know, the walls are covered with art done by kids from all over the state. Yes, it's an art of the state studio, all right, and what gets cooked up here gets distributed by PRI, Public Radio International.
Today's show is called Au Contraire, mon ami. Au Contraire, we're going to take a look at contrast in music. How do you achieve it, and how much of it do you want? Well, there are all sorts of things you can do to achieve it. You can change the, well, here, let me turn on the authentic instrument and demonstrate some of these here.
You can achieve contrast by changing the dynamics, or loudness. Mary had a little lamb.
Little lamb.
Little lamb. Mary had a little lamb. It's fleece-wise, white as snow.
Or, you can change the rhythm. Mary had a little lamb. Little lamb. Little lamb. Mary had a little lamb.
It's fleece-wise, white as snow. Or the meter. That is, how many small beats there are. And then, you can change the rhythm. And a big beat. As in, duple time. One, two. One, two. One, two. And triple time. One, two, three. One, two, three. One, two, three.
[No speech for 12s.]
You can contrast a smooth line, having sustained, connected notes, with a detached line, having short, detached notes.
Mary had a little lamb.
Little lamb.
Mary had a little lamb. Or, you can vary the tempo, or speed.
Mary had a little lamb.
[No speech for 11s.]
Little lamb is fleece-wise, white as snow. Hey. By the way, what I did there is what often, if not usually, if not almost always happens in real music. Stop. I had many pieces, which is you change more than one element for a contrasting section.
Not only did I sing the second phrase faster than the first. I also changed the accompaniment from smooth to choppy. Then you can go into another key. Well, you know, it's Mary had a little lamb. A little lamb was what she had. I said, Mary had a little lamb, fleece-wise white as snow. Whoa, whoa, whoa. Mary had a little lamb. we had a little lamb a little lamb it's a little lamb now that particular modulation or key change is going up a half step started here and we went up to there and that's a very common modulation in popular music i got to admit it's sort of a pet peeve with me so often towards the end of the tune you hear that old and it goes into the key a half step higher you know why they pick that key a half step higher you know why don't they go up a major third higher why don't they go down a fourth the reason they go up a half step is that going up gives a little bit more tension a little bit more brightness for the big end of the tune but it's still within the range of the singer if you went up any farther the top notes might be out of his or her range you know why they pick that key a half step higher you know why don't they go up a major third higher by now you're probably thinking hey the contrast i'd like to hear is another song so let me just mention a few of the myriad other possibilities you can vary the orchestration the whole idea of a concerto is based on the contrast between a large group and a solo instrument or small group you can counterpose if you approve of doing things that take more than six letters to spell you can counterpose homophonic sections hymn-like sections with contrapositions or puddle sections featuring rhythmically independent lines you can write antiphonal pieces in which the only difference between two successive phrases is where the performers are situated in the room and of course in vocal music you can change the words a lot of old folk songs have literally dozens of verses set to the same music now the question of how much contrast you want is a much trickier and more interesting one this is where we get into different pieces of music and we're going to talk about how to do that in a little bit more but first let's start out with a piece that has very little contrast in it there is no variety whatsoever in terms of orchestration meter or texture very little variety in terms of dynamics
and key and virtually none in terms of rhythm these are 16th notes four to a beat in this case now this piece we're about to hear has over 400 notes in it and all but three of those notes are 16th notes in other words rhythmically speaking you're about to hear two and a half minutes of
absolutely even notes okay i'm lying they're written absolutely even but the performer takes liberties he speeds up and slows down a bit to shape the melody and keep it from sounding mechanical nevertheless this is for a mainstream western classical work unusually easy to play and it's a very difficult piece to play and it's a very difficult piece to play and it's a very difficult piece to play unusually devoid of contrast nice piece though
[No speech for 60s.]
the first movement of bach's first suite for unaccompanied cello performed by yo-yo ma
by the way the dynamics there the softer parts getting louder getting softer none of that was written in by bach but as far as i'm concerned it's entirely appropriate to put in your own dynamics the piece virtually demands them now even when he's writing for large groups bach gets an awful lot of mileage out of just two rhythmic note values eighth notes
and 16th look at the brandenburg concertos there's six of them right here's the uh the first one uh
those are eighth notes
those are 16th notes go through a whole movement second brandenburg first movement
i haven't checked this out but i wouldn't be surprised if that whole first movement of the second brandenburg has nothing but eighth notes and 16th notes in it with the exception of the last note of a phrase which is often longer last movement of that piece
now you get a couple of little faster notes when you play the embellishments
but as far as what's written goes it's all eighth notes and 16th notes fourth brandenburg uh
Fortunately, the flutists or recorder players play those notes much better than I sing them, but they're nevertheless all eighth notes and sixteenth notes. Here's the beginning of the third Brandenburg Concerto.
[No speech for 27s.]
This movement, too, uses eighth and sixteenth notes so preponderantly that when, towards the end of the movement, he introduces a countermelody that starts with three longer notes.
It's like a blaze of sunlight breaking through the clouds.
[No speech for 14s.]
So here we've got a bunch of pieces that rhythmically, melodically, dynamically, and texturally have very little contrast, very little variety.
And yet, there are those of us who feel that the Brandenburg Concertos are up there in the cantonment. It's a category of, this is as good as it gets. As a matter of fact, some of us like to ruffle feathers by saying that if we could, we'd be willing to trade a hundred Bach cantatas for another six Brandenburgs. I had a friend in high school who didn't know any classical music, and I played him a record of the second Brandenburg. That's the one with the zingy trumpet parts in the fast movements. And he said, well, it's nice, but it all sounds the same.
How many times have you... How many times have you heard classical music people say that about rock and roll? Or rock and rollers about jazz? And it's true. If you really don't dig the basic material and respond to the small changes going on, it does all sound the same. It's like people of a different race all looking the same. Now, for instance, if you listen to a lot of bebop solos, especially the up-tempo ones,
[No speech for 23s.]
there's no more rhythmic variety in the melody and bass line of that chart. There's more of a Charlie Parker solo than there is in a Bach piece. And I've heard musicians play a game where you slide from one Mozart piece into another in such a way that most people wouldn't even notice. They're that much alike. Now, nobody's saying you don't need any contrasts. If you want to hear a piece that's utterly devoid of variety, pick up your telephone and listen to the dial tone. But you don't have to have much contrast. You don't have to have variety lights to have good music. As the three numbers of our Keep It Coming, Sweet, illustrate.
I'll see you in a little over eight minutes.
[No speech for 193s.]
The Keep It Coming, Sweet.
It began with a cut from an album called Mbuti Pygmies of the Ituri Rainforest. And this is interesting. The cut is called Musical Sticks.
But what it is, is once every three years, the Nkumbi initiation for boys takes place. This is a Bantu festival, but Mbuti take part. The beginning of the Nkumbi is heralded by the sounding of the Mahakali. These are the Makata sticks, which are made specially for each Nkumbi and destroyed along with the initiation camp when all is over. The number of sticks varies from six to nine. During this initiation, there were nine.
Each player takes a stick and holds it under his left arm, hitting it with a wooden clapper held in the right hand. The sticks are carefully shaven to exactly the right pitch. The base stick is about three feet long and the treble only 18 inches. The leader of the group beats the base stick and somewhat like the master drummer in West Africa, produces a variety of cross rhythms while trying to draw the other players off the beat. Reminds me of the old bebop players. They used to try to make the chords as complicated as possible so only the really good musicians could join in there. Anyway, here there is also a masked dancer, the man who will perform the circumcision operations, who dances with ankle bells that we could also hear. Then we have the middle movement of Bach's Second Brandenburg Concerto with the Mainz Chamber Orchestra conducted by Gertrude Kuhlman. The second movement is a piece by Günther Kehr.
And then finally, a nice little piece by Meredith Monk called Ellis Island, played by a two piano team called Double Edge, Edmund Nieman and Turret Tillis.
There's only one right way to make a martini. Use no more vermouth than a mosquito could drink. But the possibilities of mixing predictability and surprise in a piece of music are endless.
I'm Peter Schickele and the show is Schickele Mix from PRI, Public Radio. Radio International. You may not need constant variety to make good music, but during the 18th and 19th centuries in Europe, the desire for contrast increased. I guess it comes with the territory of robust romanticism. In the beginning of the 18th century, there might be plenty of contrast between one movement of a piece and the next, but there wasn't much contrast within a movement. Let's hear the beginning of that slow movement from the Second Brandenburg again.
[No speech for 18s.]
In 15 seconds, we've heard all the music of the 18th and 19th centuries and all the musical material Bach is going to use in the whole three-and-a-half-minute movement. Now let's hear the opening movement of Mozart's 34th Symphony, written in 1780, about 60 years after the Bach. There is more variety in this one movement than in all three movements of the Bach piece put together. Lots of surprise here, including what sounds like a slow introduction that turns out not to be one.
[No speech for 28s.]
Very martial music, mostly loud and percussive, but with a few surprising dramatic soft places.
[No speech for 16s.]
Here comes the second theme group.
[No speech for 23s.]
This part is everything the beginning wasn't. It's soft, it's smooth, it's gentle, with chromatic notes, notes in between the regular scale notes.
[No speech for 103s.]
Now we've got loud and soft contrasted riffs, right within the phrase. And it's getting dark, it's getting dramatic. It sounds like an opera scene. What's going on?
[No speech for 29s.]
This part sounds like neither the martial music of the opening or the sweet second theme.
[No speech for 14s.]
And now we're coming back to the recapitulation.
[No speech for 182s.]
Neville Mariner conducting the Academy of St. Martin in the Fields. In the first movement of Mozart's Symphony No. 34, in C. With all the variety there is in that movement, there's one thing that remains constant, and that's the meter. The piece is in 4-4 time throughout. 1, 2, 3, 4, 1. Now we'll move ahead a century to Brahms' Third Symphony, written in 1882-83. Here the contrasts between the first and second theme groups include not only texture and dynamics, the first theme is loud and expansive, the second soft and intimate, and not only key, the second is in a fairly remote key in relation to the first, but also meter. The first is in a large duple time.
1, 2, 1, 2.
[No speech for 27s.]
And the second theme group is in triple time.
1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3.
Another contrast between those two main themes is the first theme group, is that the motion of the first one is predominantly down,
while that of the second is predominantly up.
Now, let's take that very specific aspect of melodic shape, whether the predominant motion of the theme seems to be down or up or neutral, and see how Beethoven uses it to increase the contrast from one movement to the next in his Fifth Symphony. We begin with a melodic fragment, a motif, that is one of the most forceful downward gestures in all of music.
[No speech for 27s.]
Fate knocking on the door? Trying to break it down, I'd say. After a final downward gesture from the horns, the second theme is soft, smooth, and has a predominantly upward feeling.
[No speech for 14s.]
The upward feeling is created not only by the flute's melody, but also by the bass line,
which is the opening motif inverted, so it goes up instead of down. But the downward motion dominates the movement as a whole.
The opening motif is inverted, so it goes up instead of down.
As does the dramatic, loud, and punchy quality of the opening. What a delightful breeze, therefore, is the opening of the second movement, the contrast emphasized by gentle upward gestures.
[No speech for 28s.]
Even when this movement turns grand, the upward gesture predominates.
[No speech for 33s.]
We've had down, we've had up. What will the third movement bring? It starts with a soft upward sound, and then it goes up. but the most memorable part of the opening section, is static. It tends to stay on one note.
[No speech for 17s.]
The last movement is busy, long, loud, rich in melodic phrases, and mixes up and down gestures all over the place.
[No speech for 56s.]
Excerpts from Beethoven's Fifth Symphony, performed by the London Classical Players. The conductor's name is Roger Norrington, mine is Peter Schickele, and the program's is Schickele Mix, from PRI Public Music. Radio International. Au contraire, mon frere, contrast in music and how it grew. We're bounding ahead to the second half of the 20th century now.
This next piece is a study in contrasts. Nothing about it stays the same for long. Eight and a half minutes of solid quicksand, if you catch my drift.
[No speech for 492s.]
From one of those wonderful CD sets put out by Mosaic Records, the complete candid recordings of Charles Mingus, that was a little number called All the Things You Could Be by Now If Sigmund Freud's Wife Was Your Mother. In addition to Mingus on bass, we heard Ted Curzon on trumpet, Eric Dolphy on sax, and Danny Richman on drums. And the time for tidbit time has rolled in like a wave of wiseguyism over the sands of decorum. This next selection, has more variety than a Hollywood newsstand. Talk about quick change artists. Everything is catchy, yes.
[No speech for 12s.]
Fingertips, fingertips, fingertips. I hear the wind blow. I hear the wind blow. It seems to say, hello, hello.
I'm the one who loves you so. Hey now everybody now.
Hey now everybody. Hey now everybody now. Who is that standing out my window?
I found a new friend underneath my pillow. Come on and wreck my car.
Come on and wreck my car.
Who hits me in the eye? Are you the guy who hits me in the eye?
Please pass the milk, please.
Please pass the milk, please. Please pass the milk, please.
Leave me alone, leave me alone. Who's knocking on the wall?
Myself. What's that blue thing doing here?
Something grabbed me.
[No speech for 11s.]
I don't understand you.
I don't understand you. I just don't understand you.
I don't understand you. I don't understand the things you say. I cannot understand you.
I don't understand you.
I heard a sound.
I turned around. Turned around to find the thing that made the sound.
Mysteri- Mysterious whisper Mysterious whisper
Mysterious whisper
Mysterious whisper The day that love
Came to play
I'm having a heart attack I'm having a heart attack
[No speech for 11s.]
Pips Face Fingertips
They might be giants from their album Apollo 18.
And that was called Fingertips. Now, the weird thing about this listing is, on the back of the album, it says that track 17 is Fingertips. But then the next track, Spacesuit, is track 38. And when you open it up and look inside there, you realize that every one of those little segments is given a separate track number. Now, if they only list it once on the back, why did they do that? Well, being an old fogey, I wouldn't have known. But my kids filled me in on it. See, CD players these days often have a button for random programming. So instead of listening to the album in the same old order every time, you put a bunch of CDs in these things, and it'll just randomly access tunes from all over the place.
And what'll happen here, of course, is that those little segments, individual little segments, will pop in. You know, they'll pop in. You know, between Bing Crosby singing White Christmas and who knows what else. Neat little idea. You know, I just realized while I'm saying this that my CD player has a random programming thing. Let me push that, and I'm going to start it and see what happens.
[No speech for 14s.]
Hey, that's not bad. I like that. And that's Schickele Mix for this week. Our program is made possible with funds provided by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and by this radio station and its generous members. Not only that. Our program is distributed by PRI, Public Radio International. We'll tell you in a moment how you can get an official playlist of all the music on today's program with record numbers and everything.
Just refer to the program number. This is program number 70. And this is Peter Schickele saying goodbye and reminding you that it don't mean a thing if it ain't got that certain je ne sais quoi. You're looking good. See you next week.
[No speech for 101s.]
If you'd like a copy of that playlist I mentioned, send a stamped self-addressed envelope to Schickele Mix. That's S-C-H-I-C-K-E-L-E, Schickele Mix.
Care of Public Radio International, 100 North 6th Street, Suite 900A, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55403.