1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:11,000
This is WIAA Interlochen 88.7 FM and WICV East Jordan Charlevoix 100.9 FM.

2
00:00:11,000 --> 00:00:32,000
Yes, I'm ready. Or, to put it another way, I am not unprepared. Here's the theme.

3
00:00:32,000 --> 00:00:41,000
Hello there, I'm Peter Shickely, and this is Shickely Mix, a program dedicated to the proposition that all musics are created equal.

4
00:00:42,000 --> 00:00:46,000
Or, as Duke Ellington put it, if it sounds good, it is good.

5
00:00:47,000 --> 00:00:55,000
And once again, I have the good fortune to report that our bills are paid by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, by the National Endowment for the Arts,

6
00:00:55,000 --> 00:01:04,000
and by this, I've said it before and I'll say it again, excellent radio station within whose walls I concoct these hearty oral delicacies,

7
00:01:05,000 --> 00:01:12,000
consisting of a good solid filling of education topped with a light, fluffy meringue of entertainment.

8
00:01:13,000 --> 00:01:22,000
Once out of the digital oven, the tart but tasty pedagogical pies are loaded into a delivery truck that floats thousands of miles above the earth.

9
00:01:22,000 --> 00:01:29,000
Once they are distributed to the culturally starved public by PRI, Public Radio International.

10
00:01:30,000 --> 00:01:41,000
In 1764, when Mozart was eight years old, he and his sister and their father were in London, and Leopold got sick, so they moved to a house in the country.

11
00:01:41,000 --> 00:01:52,000
Since TV and Legos and goop and video games, in fact anything that was any fun at all, hadn't been invented yet, there wasn't much for the kids to do.

12
00:01:53,000 --> 00:01:59,000
So little Wolfie said to himself, I think I'll sit down and write the first of my 41 symphonies.

13
00:02:00,000 --> 00:02:06,000
Naturally, he wrote in the style that was the happenin' thing in those days, a style that is now called Rococo.

14
00:02:06,000 --> 00:02:12,000
One of the characteristics of that style is frequent and literal repetition.

15
00:02:12,000 --> 00:02:41,000
Here's the beginning of Mozart's 11th Symphony, written at the ripe old age of 14.

16
00:02:42,000 --> 00:03:09,000
Charles McCarris conducting the opening of Mozart's 11th Symphony, in which everything you hear, you hear twice, and the second verse is the same as the first.

17
00:03:09,000 --> 00:03:20,000
On another edition of this program, we looked into the uses of literal repetition, and today we're going to consider a related technique called sneaky repetition.

18
00:03:21,000 --> 00:03:33,000
That's where you endeavor to take advantage of some of the attractions of repetition, the comfort of the familiar and the enlightenment that results from hearing the same thing in different contexts,

19
00:03:33,000 --> 00:03:43,000
without risking the tedium that would inevitably descend upon anyone who had to sit still and listen to 99 bottles of beer on the wall.

20
00:03:44,000 --> 00:03:51,000
Composers have developed several ways of repeating some aspects of musical material while the very others.

21
00:03:52,000 --> 00:03:56,000
In heavy duty intellectual hands, this can get pretty arcane.

22
00:03:56,000 --> 00:04:08,000
A lot of music written in the 20th century follows the principle of so-called 12-tone composition, in which a whole piece is based on a single ordering of the 12 pitches of the octave.

23
00:04:09,000 --> 00:04:23,000
This 12-tone row is constantly repeated, but often backwards, upside down, vertically, different rhythms, you name it, to a point where, in most such pieces, even a trained musician cannot follow the progress of the row.

24
00:04:23,000 --> 00:04:34,000
And that's nothing new. In the 14th century, composers distinguished between color, a set of melodic pitches, and talia, a fixed rhythmic pattern.

25
00:04:35,000 --> 00:04:44,000
Now, if the color and the talia have a different number of units, but you keep repeating both, they don't come out together.

26
00:04:45,000 --> 00:04:51,000
Even though the color is repeating and the talia is repeating, what comes out when they're combined is constantly changing.

27
00:04:51,000 --> 00:05:00,000
Let me illustrate by using two of the biggest hits of the last two millennia, Dies Irae and Shave in a Haircut.

28
00:05:01,000 --> 00:05:05,000
As our color, we'll use the first eight pitches of Dies Irae.

29
00:05:12,000 --> 00:05:16,000
Our talia, however, has only seven notes.

30
00:05:16,000 --> 00:05:25,000
Now, if you keep feeding those eight pitches to that seven-note rhythm, here's what you get.

31
00:05:26,000 --> 00:05:30,000
And I had to write this out. I wasn't sure I could really keep track of it in my head.

32
00:05:31,000 --> 00:05:38,000
And I wouldn't want to, you know, mess up the color or the talia right here on the air with everybody listening.

33
00:05:39,000 --> 00:05:44,000
Boy, that would be the worst. Angry letters, membership cancellations.

34
00:05:44,000 --> 00:05:46,000
Anyway, here's how it works out.

35
00:05:46,000 --> 00:05:49,000
And here's how it works out.

36
00:05:49,000 --> 00:06:15,000
You have to go through the rhythm eight times to make it come out even with the pitches.

37
00:06:15,000 --> 00:06:24,000
Okay, here's a motet by the middle-aged composer. Well, actually, I don't know how old he was, but he lived in the middle ages.

38
00:06:25,000 --> 00:06:31,000
Philippe de Vitry. The two top voices are free, but the bottom voice, which is doubled by an instrument,

39
00:06:32,000 --> 00:06:40,000
is singing a line that is based on a 12-note talia and a color, as far as I can tell from the printed music, with 19 pitches.

40
00:06:40,000 --> 00:06:49,000
And if you can follow that while you're listening to it for the first time, please drop a self-addressed stamped envelope to me in the mail,

41
00:06:49,000 --> 00:07:10,000
and I'll send you a Ph.D. in Musicology with minors in ear training and chutzpah. Here's the motet.

42
00:07:19,000 --> 00:07:37,000
The two top voices are free, but the bottom voice, which is doubled by an instrument, is singing a line that is doubled by an instrument,

43
00:07:37,000 --> 00:07:52,000
and I'll send you a Ph.D. in Musicology with minors in ear training and chutzpah.

44
00:07:52,000 --> 00:08:08,000
The two top voices are free, but the bottom voice, which is doubled by an instrument, is singing a line that is doubled by an instrument,

45
00:08:08,000 --> 00:08:24,000
and I'll send you a Ph.D. in Musicology with minors in ear training and chutzpah.

46
00:08:24,000 --> 00:08:49,000
And I'll send you a Ph.D. in Musicology with minors in ear training and chutzpah.

47
00:08:54,000 --> 00:09:03,000
The motet in Garret Gallus, which is Latin for the Frenchman in the apartment on the top floor, by Philippe de Vitry,

48
00:09:04,000 --> 00:09:09,000
performed by members of the Early Music Studio in Munich under the direction of Thomas Brinkley.

49
00:09:10,000 --> 00:09:12,000
Talia by Shire, color by Eastman Kodak.

50
00:09:13,000 --> 00:09:18,000
The term applied to the talia in a situation like that is isorhythmic.

51
00:09:18,000 --> 00:09:27,000
The prefix iso means, well, you weather buffs know that an isobar is a place you can go and get a drink when it's really cold outside.

52
00:09:28,000 --> 00:09:33,000
But there's no reason that the term isorhythmic has to be restricted to discussions of medieval music.

53
00:09:34,000 --> 00:09:41,000
As far as I'm concerned, it can be used any time the rhythm stays the same, but the contour of the pitches varies.

54
00:09:41,000 --> 00:09:51,000
Here's an isorhythmic melody. I'll clap out the talia first, and I'll do it twice, otherwise you don't know how long the last note is.

55
00:10:11,000 --> 00:10:35,000
Orhythmic melody.

56
00:10:35,000 --> 00:10:41,000
Beethoven's Seventh Symphony, Roger Norrington and the London Classical Players.

57
00:10:42,000 --> 00:10:45,000
Here's another beautiful example of an isorhythmic melody.

58
00:10:46,000 --> 00:10:55,000
There are a couple of slight variations, but basically the same seven-note rhythm is used for this entire one-and-a-half-minute melody.

59
00:10:55,000 --> 00:11:07,000
I'll clap out the talia first.

60
00:11:25,000 --> 00:11:46,000
Here's an isorhythmic melody.

61
00:11:46,000 --> 00:12:09,000
Here's an isorhythmic melody.

62
00:12:09,000 --> 00:12:32,000
Here's another beautiful example of an isorhythmic melody.

63
00:12:32,000 --> 00:12:50,000
The Grumio Trio, playing a theme from Mozart's Divertamento in E-flat, K.563 for string trio.

64
00:12:50,000 --> 00:13:02,000
The Talia of an Isorhythmic Theme. And you know, by the way, I should mention, I don't want you folks, you know, getting into trouble on your music exams because of me.

65
00:13:03,000 --> 00:13:11,000
Some of these terms are not usually applied to post-Renaissance music. But I figure, as the monks used to say, quo d'inferno. What the heck?

66
00:13:11,000 --> 00:13:19,000
As I was saying, the talia or rhythmic pattern of an isorhythmic melody is not necessarily unique to that melody.

67
00:13:20,000 --> 00:13:26,000
Another well-known isorhythmic theme uses exactly the same talia as that Mozart melody.

68
00:13:27,000 --> 00:13:36,000
Here, I'm going to swing around here. Okay, let me check out the authentic instrument here. I've got it set on good piano.

69
00:13:36,000 --> 00:13:41,000
Okay, now, let me clap out the rhythm. It's exactly the same as it was for the Mozart.

70
00:13:41,000 --> 00:14:10,000
Twinkle, twinkle, little star How I wonder what you are Way up in the sky so blue I don't know the lyrics to This little song, no siree And now we know our ABC

71
00:14:11,000 --> 00:14:21,000
You know, there's certain songs like the Star-Spangled Banner and Auld Lang Syne that everybody thinks they know the words to until they actually try to sing it.

72
00:14:22,000 --> 00:14:25,000
Well, let me swing back to Control Central here.

73
00:14:26,000 --> 00:14:33,000
Okay, I was just thinking that the slow movement of Haydn's Surprise Symphony starts out with the same pattern.

74
00:14:33,000 --> 00:14:43,000
But it doesn't stick to that pattern throughout the theme.

75
00:14:44,000 --> 00:14:52,000
You know, I needn't have bothered to work out a piano accompaniment to Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star.

76
00:14:53,000 --> 00:14:59,000
I mean, not that it was any big deal, but it just occurred to me that Brahms already wrote one.

77
00:14:59,000 --> 00:15:05,000
I could sing that puppy to an orchestral accompaniment. I think I have it here, too.

78
00:15:06,000 --> 00:15:10,000
I'm not using it on this show, but I had it for some stuff I'm getting ready here. Yep, here it is.

79
00:15:11,000 --> 00:15:16,000
Let me get this thing in here. Okay, let's do Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star again.

80
00:15:16,000 --> 00:15:28,000
Twinkle, twinkle, little star, how I wonder what you are.

81
00:15:29,000 --> 00:15:37,000
Just fooling around there, I couldn't resist. How often do I get to sing nursery rhymes with a symphony orchestra?

82
00:15:38,000 --> 00:15:42,000
Okay, back to business. Now, I'd like to make a few distinctions here.

83
00:15:42,000 --> 00:15:53,000
The term isorhythmic is not productively employed to describe situations in which a phrase or a pair of phrases simply repeats.

84
00:15:54,000 --> 00:16:09,000
Do the honk-a-bock, do the honk-a-bock, do the honk-a-bock, do the honk-a-bock, do the honk-a-bock, do the honk-a-bock, do the honk-a-bock.

85
00:16:09,000 --> 00:16:16,000
I'm not very good on lyrics, you know. That's just simple repetition, period. Both pitches and rhythm.

86
00:16:17,000 --> 00:16:21,000
As a matter of fact, that is one of the simplest repetitions I've ever heard.

87
00:16:22,000 --> 00:16:26,000
Nor is it useful to use isorhythmic to describe this.

88
00:16:26,000 --> 00:16:41,000
Do a deer, a female deer, ray a drop of golden sun, me a name I call myself, fa a long, long way to run.

89
00:16:42,000 --> 00:16:48,000
See, in that case, the contour of the second pair of phrases is exactly the same as that of the first pair.

90
00:16:48,000 --> 00:16:55,000
The second pair simply starts on a higher note. That's called a sequence, and we'll talk more about that later.

91
00:16:56,000 --> 00:17:04,000
Isorhythmic really means that the rhythm repeats while not only the actual pitches but also the shape of the phrases change.

92
00:17:05,000 --> 00:17:09,000
There was a song that was popular when I was a kid, when I was in sixth grade.

93
00:17:09,000 --> 00:17:18,000
I'm sure I won't remember all the words, but it goes, give me five minutes more, only five minutes more.

94
00:17:19,000 --> 00:17:23,000
Give me five minutes more in your arms.

95
00:17:30,000 --> 00:17:34,000
Give me five minutes more of your charms.

96
00:17:34,000 --> 00:17:38,000
Now, for that, the talia was simply this.

97
00:17:39,000 --> 00:17:42,000
That whole melody is based on that rhythm.

98
00:17:43,000 --> 00:17:52,000
Now, I sang that very straight to emphasize the basic isorhythmic structure of the tune, and it's probably noted that way on the sheet music, too.

99
00:17:53,000 --> 00:17:57,000
But a pop singer would feel free to vary the rhythm somewhat in performance.

100
00:17:57,000 --> 00:18:03,000
Give me five minutes more, only five minutes more.

101
00:18:04,000 --> 00:18:10,000
Give me five minutes more in your arms, or whatever the words are.

102
00:18:11,000 --> 00:18:19,000
Here's a beautiful song that is mostly isorhythmic, with ten notes in each of its six phrases.

103
00:18:20,000 --> 00:18:23,000
But there's a slight variation in the third phrase, one note instead of two.

104
00:18:23,000 --> 00:18:29,000
And then the fifth phrase just opens up. It makes a couple of the notes even longer.

105
00:18:30,000 --> 00:18:32,000
It's a beautifully expansive touch.

106
00:18:33,000 --> 00:18:38,000
O come, O come, Emmanuel,

107
00:18:39,000 --> 00:18:44,000
And ransom captive Israel,

108
00:18:45,000 --> 00:18:50,000
That mourns in lowly exile here,

109
00:18:50,000 --> 00:18:56,000
Until the Son of God appear.

110
00:18:57,000 --> 00:19:03,000
Rejoice, rejoice, Emmanuel,

111
00:19:04,000 --> 00:19:11,000
Is come to thee, O Israel.

112
00:19:11,000 --> 00:19:26,000
An angelically beautiful song, sung by an extremely earthbound singer named Peter Shickley, who is also, as it turns out, host of Shickley Mix, from PRI, Public Radio International.

113
00:19:27,000 --> 00:19:32,000
Today's show is called, And Now for Something Not Really So Very Different at All.

114
00:19:32,000 --> 00:19:40,000
We're talking about techniques that simultaneously employ repetition and change, and isorhythm is one of them.

115
00:19:41,000 --> 00:19:47,000
But composers, of course, are not out to illustrate descriptive terms. They're out to move us with their music.

116
00:19:48,000 --> 00:19:53,000
They use the techniques we're discussing, but they don't feel it necessary to use them consistently.

117
00:19:54,000 --> 00:19:59,000
Here's a suite of three pieces that use isorhythmic phrases to varying degrees.

118
00:19:59,000 --> 00:20:05,000
The rhythms of the phrases in the first selection are very similar, but not identical.

119
00:20:06,000 --> 00:20:12,000
If they were, maybe the poor musicians who, as good as they are, are hanging on for dear life,

120
00:20:13,000 --> 00:20:18,000
maybe they would have been able to stay together, even with the very little rehearsal I suspect they had.

121
00:20:19,000 --> 00:20:22,000
The middle excerpt is consistent, except at the end of each section.

122
00:20:22,000 --> 00:20:30,000
And the third number uses one slightly varied pattern in the body of the verses, but the ending refrain breaks the pattern.

123
00:20:31,000 --> 00:20:34,000
And remember, we're only talking about the melody here, not the accompaniment.

124
00:20:34,000 --> 00:20:52,000
The more-or-less isorhythmic suite lasts about seven minutes. I'll see you then.

125
00:21:04,000 --> 00:21:19,000
The more-or-less isorhythmic suite lasts about seven minutes.

126
00:24:19,000 --> 00:24:23,000
["Pomp and Circumstance"]

127
00:24:49,000 --> 00:24:52,000
["Pomp and Circumstance"]

128
00:25:19,000 --> 00:25:22,000
["The Cash Song"]

129
00:25:30,000 --> 00:25:34,000
["The Cash Song"]

130
00:25:34,000 --> 00:25:38,000
["The Cash Song"]

131
00:25:45,000 --> 00:25:49,000
["The Cash Song"]

132
00:25:49,000 --> 00:25:53,000
["The Cash Song"]

133
00:26:01,000 --> 00:26:05,000
["The Cash Song"]

134
00:26:05,000 --> 00:26:09,000
["The Cash Song"]

135
00:26:16,000 --> 00:26:20,000
["The Cash Song"]

136
00:26:20,000 --> 00:26:48,000
["The Cash Song"]

137
00:26:48,000 --> 00:26:52,000
["The Cash Song"]

138
00:26:52,000 --> 00:27:19,000
["The Cash Song"]

139
00:27:19,000 --> 00:27:28,000
The more-or-less isorhythmic suite began with Miles Davis, the Porgy and Bess album, and that was gone.

140
00:27:28,000 --> 00:27:34,000
And of course, only the main part of the tune is more or less isorhythmic.

141
00:27:34,000 --> 00:27:40,000
When it gets to the improvising and the sort of other part of the tune there, that's completely different.

142
00:27:40,000 --> 00:27:47,000
Then the second number was one of the variations from the sixth movement of Mozart's Serenade No. 10,

143
00:27:47,000 --> 00:27:51,000
also called the Gran Partita, for 13 wind instruments.

144
00:27:51,000 --> 00:27:55,000
That was the Sabine Meyer wind ensemble.

145
00:27:55,000 --> 00:28:00,000
And then finally the coasters with Yakety Yak.

146
00:28:00,000 --> 00:28:02,000
Now let's talk about sex.

147
00:28:02,000 --> 00:28:05,000
No, I mean, let's talk about sequences.

148
00:28:05,000 --> 00:28:10,000
Sequences are not what sexy nightclub singers have on their gowns.

149
00:28:10,000 --> 00:28:16,000
No, in modern musical parlance, sequences occur when both the rhythm and the shape of the phrase are repeated,

150
00:28:16,000 --> 00:28:19,000
but each phrase starts on a different note.

151
00:28:19,000 --> 00:28:22,000
Listen to the bass instruments here.

152
00:28:22,000 --> 00:28:32,000
The contour of the phrases remains exactly the same, but each time the phrases start on a lower degree of the scale.

153
00:28:32,000 --> 00:28:48,000
.

154
00:28:48,000 --> 00:28:52,000
Mozart No. 38, MacHarris and the Prague Chamber Orchestra again.

155
00:28:52,000 --> 00:28:56,000
Here's a sequence that I'll bet many of you have played.

156
00:28:56,000 --> 00:29:11,000
.

157
00:29:11,000 --> 00:29:14,000
Now that sequence was just in the right hand.

158
00:29:14,000 --> 00:29:17,000
It too moved down a step each time.

159
00:29:17,000 --> 00:29:24,000
This one involves both hands, and once again, each measure is a step lower than the previous one.

160
00:29:24,000 --> 00:29:35,000
.

161
00:29:35,000 --> 00:29:38,000
Okay, now let's hear the whole brief section.

162
00:29:38,000 --> 00:29:41,000
The first two phrases are virtually isorhythmic.

163
00:29:41,000 --> 00:29:46,000
Then we have that first sequence and a transition involving very little repetition.

164
00:29:46,000 --> 00:29:50,000
The second theme begins with a simple straightforward repetition.

165
00:29:50,000 --> 00:29:54,000
Then comes the second sequence and a little coda with a one-bar repeat.

166
00:29:54,000 --> 00:29:55,000
Got that?

167
00:29:55,000 --> 00:29:57,000
Take it away, Walt.

168
00:29:57,000 --> 00:30:26,000
.

169
00:30:26,000 --> 00:30:50,000
.

170
00:30:50,000 --> 00:30:56,000
Walter Gieseking, playing the first section of Mozart's Piano Sonata in C.K. 545.

171
00:30:56,000 --> 00:31:03,000
A lovely little work, in spite of the fact that to many kids it's the musical equivalent of spinach.

172
00:31:03,000 --> 00:31:10,000
Which brings us to what is perhaps the most outrageous, the most egregious sequence of all time.

173
00:31:10,000 --> 00:31:14,000
One whole minute spent on four notes.

174
00:31:14,000 --> 00:31:43,000
.

175
00:31:43,000 --> 00:32:10,000
.

176
00:32:10,000 --> 00:32:16,000
.

177
00:32:16,000 --> 00:32:22,000
The favorite passage of pathologically obsessive people around the world.

178
00:32:22,000 --> 00:32:29,000
It's from Tchaikovsky's 1812 Overture, and we heard Placido Domingo conducting the Philharmonia.

179
00:32:29,000 --> 00:32:33,000
And here's another classic example of sequencing.

180
00:32:33,000 --> 00:32:40,000
Just as in the two Mozart pieces, each phrase in this aria is a step lower than the previous one.

181
00:32:40,000 --> 00:32:58,000
.

182
00:32:58,000 --> 00:33:03,000
But wait a minute, wait a minute, hold it, hold it, hold it, hold it, that's not all, wait a minute.

183
00:33:03,000 --> 00:33:09,000
This piece, this piece has sequencing within sequencing.

184
00:33:09,000 --> 00:33:20,000
Not only are the second and third phrases sequences of the first phrase, but the second group of three phrases is a sequence of the first group.

185
00:33:20,000 --> 00:33:26,000
The second group is exactly the same as the first group, but a step higher.

186
00:33:26,000 --> 00:33:28,000
Isn't that something?

187
00:33:56,000 --> 00:34:09,000
.

188
00:34:09,000 --> 00:34:20,000
Now, the next one, the third phrase group, is not a sequence, but it is pretty darn isorhythmic.

189
00:34:20,000 --> 00:34:34,000
Now, do you respect this song?

190
00:34:34,000 --> 00:34:54,000
.

191
00:34:54,000 --> 00:35:14,000
.

192
00:35:14,000 --> 00:35:22,000
.

193
00:35:22,000 --> 00:35:32,000
.

194
00:35:32,000 --> 00:35:42,000
.

195
00:35:42,000 --> 00:36:02,000
.

196
00:36:02,000 --> 00:36:12,000
.

197
00:36:12,000 --> 00:36:22,000
.

198
00:36:22,000 --> 00:36:32,000
.

199
00:36:32,000 --> 00:36:42,000
.

200
00:36:42,000 --> 00:36:52,000
.

201
00:36:52,000 --> 00:36:56,000
.

202
00:36:56,000 --> 00:37:00,000
Frank Sinatra, singing Strangers in the Night.

203
00:37:00,000 --> 00:37:04,000
That song has the least modulating modulation in it I've ever heard.

204
00:37:04,000 --> 00:37:09,000
It just stops and then starts again, one key higher.

205
00:37:09,000 --> 00:37:22,000
It's also one of the most isorhythmically repetitious songs of all time, which is undoubtedly why some people love it and others hate it with such undying passion.

206
00:37:22,000 --> 00:37:29,000
Oh, hey, hey, no way, that's for me to know and you to find out.

207
00:37:29,000 --> 00:37:32,000
No, sir, people feel very strongly about that song.

208
00:37:32,000 --> 00:37:36,000
Name and serial number, that's all you get from me.

209
00:37:36,000 --> 00:37:43,000
Peter Shickley, Shickley Mix from PRI, Public Radio International.

210
00:37:43,000 --> 00:37:51,000
And now for something not really so very different at all is the name of today's show, Nifty Ways to Combine Repetition and Variation.

211
00:37:51,000 --> 00:38:02,000
One of the niftiest is a very 20th century idea that nevertheless harkens back to that uneven color and talia thing we began today's show with.

212
00:38:02,000 --> 00:38:11,000
This is where you take a short repeated figure called an ostinato and combine it with another short repeated figure of a different length.

213
00:38:11,000 --> 00:38:22,000
Now, any radio program could throw on a CD of Bartok or Stravinsky at this point, illustrating the technique of overlapping ostinato.

214
00:38:22,000 --> 00:38:27,000
But only on Shickley Mix can you have a piece composed especially for you.

215
00:38:27,000 --> 00:38:30,000
This will be a world premiere, folks.

216
00:38:30,000 --> 00:38:35,000
I've got the authentic instrument set up for recording directly into the sampling system here.

217
00:38:35,000 --> 00:38:39,000
I don't even have to turn around. I'm just going to play one line at a time.

218
00:38:39,000 --> 00:38:46,000
Okay, now first I'm going to lay down a three note repeating figure. Here we go.

219
00:38:51,000 --> 00:38:56,000
You know, I don't even have to worry about being quiet because it's going on directly into the sampler.

220
00:38:56,000 --> 00:39:00,000
It doesn't even involve the microphone. I can play this in my sleep.

221
00:39:13,000 --> 00:39:19,000
Okay, now I'm going to, let me get this thing set for the top again.

222
00:39:19,000 --> 00:39:26,000
Now I'm going to add at the same speed a figure with four notes in it.

223
00:39:26,000 --> 00:39:50,000
Oh, I'm afraid you can't hear it while I'm adding it in. I can in my earphones, but sorry about that.

224
00:39:50,000 --> 00:39:58,000
Okay, moving right along, ladies and gentlemen. For your listening pleasure, I will now add a figure with five notes in it.

225
00:39:58,000 --> 00:40:00,000
And here we go.

226
00:40:00,000 --> 00:40:24,000
I worked this out while I was taking my shower this morning, so you and I will both be hearing it for the first time together.

227
00:40:24,000 --> 00:40:36,000
Okay, now I think I'll add a one note part, half as fast, just to define the beat. And we're off.

228
00:40:42,000 --> 00:40:50,000
You know, we've got groups of three, four and five notes going already. This pulse will organize them into beats.

229
00:40:50,000 --> 00:40:54,000
Must be pretty boring for you.

230
00:40:59,000 --> 00:41:09,000
Okay, now, let's hear what we've got so far. In addition to the pulse, we've got a three note figure, a four note figure, and a five note figure going.

231
00:41:09,000 --> 00:41:19,000
Which means that even though those very short ostinati are repeating relentlessly, the whole thing, the way they combine, only repeats every sixty notes.

232
00:41:19,000 --> 00:41:24,000
Here it is. Unless you're driving, close your eyes.

233
00:41:50,000 --> 00:41:59,000
That's nice. Not bad. But I think I'd like to not only have a beat, but organize the beats into measures.

234
00:41:59,000 --> 00:42:07,000
I'll add one more line here, which will put the piece into three, four time. Like this.

235
00:42:07,000 --> 00:42:24,000
Actually, actually, wait a minute. You know, I can let you hear the whole thing while I add a part. I forgot about this button here, which will feed it into the console before...

236
00:42:24,000 --> 00:42:37,000
Okay, here we go. Here's the... what should we name this thing? Let's call it the Dream of Overlapping Ostinati Waltz.

237
00:42:54,000 --> 00:43:10,000
Now, I have to admit that I'm a sucker for that kind of texture. At least up to a point I can really trance out on it.

238
00:43:10,000 --> 00:43:16,000
But if it's a bit too repetitious for your taste, well, there's another great use for this kind of thing.

239
00:43:16,000 --> 00:43:27,000
We can make our whole little piece an accompaniment for a song. We can add a vocal line that is completely independent, that has nothing to do with Ostinati.

240
00:43:27,000 --> 00:43:34,000
Let me get the mic going in here, and might as well get ready to add some echo.

241
00:43:34,000 --> 00:43:41,000
Okay, folks, here it is. The absolutely latest version of one of the world's most beloved songs.

242
00:43:41,000 --> 00:43:45,000
And remember, you heard it first on Shickly Mix.

243
00:43:45,000 --> 00:44:13,000
Twinkle, twinkle, little star, how I wonder what you are. How I wonder what you are. How I wonder what you are.

244
00:44:13,000 --> 00:44:21,000
There you have it, folks. The world premiere of the Twinkling Star Dream of Overlapping Ostinati Waltz.

245
00:44:21,000 --> 00:44:25,000
Exclusive on Shickly Mix. What a scoop.

246
00:44:25,000 --> 00:44:32,000
Well, folks, our last suite is a bit of an antidote to the systematic systems of partial repetition we've been looking at.

247
00:44:32,000 --> 00:44:44,000
Here are three pieces that are either unusually non-repetitive compared to other examples of their genres, or repetitive in very irregular, hard to predict ways.

248
00:44:44,000 --> 00:44:48,000
In either case, you don't know what to expect.

249
00:44:48,000 --> 00:44:56,000
The first piece is by Mozart, and as you listen, think back to the beginning of that 11th symphony, in which every four bars was repeated.

250
00:44:56,000 --> 00:45:01,000
Here there is repeated material, but you're never sure when it's going to happen.

251
00:45:01,000 --> 00:45:05,000
The second number is a song you've probably heard a million times.

252
00:45:05,000 --> 00:45:11,000
But listen to how sprawling the melody is, how little repetition there is in the first 16 bars.

253
00:45:11,000 --> 00:45:19,000
Even the lyrics are unusual, formally. There are rhymes, but they don't come where you expect at regular places.

254
00:45:19,000 --> 00:45:23,000
Then we'll go out on the third piece, which is a hoot and a half.

255
00:45:23,000 --> 00:45:28,000
Lots of repetition, but so irregular that you're always on your toes.

256
00:45:28,000 --> 00:45:33,000
Okay, here's the Expect the Unexpected Suite.

257
00:46:28,000 --> 00:46:31,000
Okay, here we go.

258
00:46:58,000 --> 00:47:01,000
Here we go.

259
00:47:28,000 --> 00:47:31,000
Here we go.

260
00:47:58,000 --> 00:48:01,000
Here we go.

261
00:48:28,000 --> 00:48:31,000
Here we go.

262
00:48:58,000 --> 00:49:01,000
Here we go.

263
00:49:28,000 --> 00:49:31,000
Here we go.

264
00:49:58,000 --> 00:50:04,000
The lonely night

265
00:50:04,000 --> 00:50:07,000
Dreaming of a song

266
00:50:07,000 --> 00:50:11,000
The melody

267
00:50:11,000 --> 00:50:15,000
Haunts my reverie

268
00:50:15,000 --> 00:50:21,000
And I am once again with you

269
00:50:21,000 --> 00:50:27,000
When our love was new

270
00:50:27,000 --> 00:50:35,000
And each kiss an inspiration

271
00:50:35,000 --> 00:50:41,000
But that was long ago

272
00:50:41,000 --> 00:50:45,000
And now my consolation

273
00:50:45,000 --> 00:50:51,000
Is in the stardust of a song

274
00:50:51,000 --> 00:50:58,000
Beside a garden wall

275
00:50:58,000 --> 00:51:03,000
When the stars are bright

276
00:51:03,000 --> 00:51:07,000
You are in my arms

277
00:51:07,000 --> 00:51:11,000
The nightingale

278
00:51:11,000 --> 00:51:15,000
Tells his fairy tale

279
00:51:15,000 --> 00:51:21,000
Of paradise where roses grew

280
00:51:21,000 --> 00:51:28,000
Though I dream in vain

281
00:51:28,000 --> 00:51:32,000
In my heart

282
00:51:32,000 --> 00:51:36,000
It will remain

283
00:51:36,000 --> 00:51:42,000
My stardust melody

284
00:51:42,000 --> 00:51:48,000
The memory of love's refrain

285
00:52:12,000 --> 00:52:19,000
Oh, I dream in vain

286
00:52:19,000 --> 00:52:23,000
In my heart

287
00:52:23,000 --> 00:52:27,000
It always will remain

288
00:52:27,000 --> 00:52:33,000
My stardust melody

289
00:52:33,000 --> 00:52:39,000
The memory of love's refrain

290
00:52:39,000 --> 00:52:43,000
My stardust melody

291
00:52:43,000 --> 00:53:10,000
The memory of love's refrain

292
00:53:13,000 --> 00:53:20,000
My stardust melody

293
00:53:20,000 --> 00:53:28,000
The memory of love's refrain

294
00:53:28,000 --> 00:53:36,000
The memory of love's refrain

295
00:53:36,000 --> 00:53:46,000
My stardust melody

296
00:53:46,000 --> 00:53:56,000
The memory of love's refrain

297
00:53:56,000 --> 00:54:06,000
My stardust melody

298
00:54:06,000 --> 00:54:16,000
The memory of love's refrain

299
00:54:16,000 --> 00:54:26,000
My stardust melody

300
00:54:26,000 --> 00:54:46,000
My stardust melody

301
00:54:46,000 --> 00:54:51,000
The expect, the unexpected suite began with the first movement

302
00:54:51,000 --> 00:54:57,000
of Mozart's Divertimento K136, that was the Academy of St. Martin

303
00:54:57,000 --> 00:55:00,000
in the Fields chamber ensemble.

304
00:55:00,000 --> 00:55:04,000
Then we heard Joe Stafford singing Hoagy Carmichael's Stardust,

305
00:55:04,000 --> 00:55:09,000
and what we're hearing right now is Short Ride in a Fast Machine

306
00:55:09,000 --> 00:55:14,000
by John Adams being played by the City of Birmingham Symphony Orchestra

307
00:55:14,000 --> 00:55:17,000
under the direction of Simon Rattle.

308
00:55:17,000 --> 00:55:19,000
And that's Sickly Mix for this week.

309
00:55:19,000 --> 00:55:22,000
Our program is made possible with funds provided

310
00:55:22,000 --> 00:55:24,000
by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting,

311
00:55:24,000 --> 00:55:27,000
by the National Endowment for the Arts,

312
00:55:27,000 --> 00:55:30,000
and by this radio station and its members.

313
00:55:30,000 --> 00:55:31,000
Thank you, members.

314
00:55:31,000 --> 00:55:36,000
Our program is distributed by PRI, Public Radio International.

315
00:55:36,000 --> 00:55:40,000
We'll tell you in a moment how you can get an official playlist

316
00:55:40,000 --> 00:55:44,000
of all the music on today's program with album numbers and everything.

317
00:55:44,000 --> 00:55:46,000
Just refer to the program number.

318
00:55:46,000 --> 00:55:49,000
This is program number 115.

319
00:55:49,000 --> 00:55:52,000
And this is Peter Shickley saying goodbye

320
00:55:52,000 --> 00:55:54,000
and reminding you that it don't mean a thing

321
00:55:54,000 --> 00:55:57,000
if it ain't got that certain je ne sais quoi.

322
00:55:57,000 --> 00:55:58,000
You're looking good.

323
00:55:58,000 --> 00:56:27,000
See you next week.

324
00:56:28,000 --> 00:56:33,000
Thank you.

325
00:56:58,000 --> 00:57:21,000
If you'd like a copy of that playlist I mentioned,

326
00:57:21,000 --> 00:57:40,000
send a stamped self-addressed envelope to Shickley Mix.

327
00:57:40,000 --> 00:57:56,000
PRI, Public Radio International.