1 00:00:00,400 --> 00:00:02,860 Well, Mr. Schickele, how's it going today? 2 00:00:03,500 --> 00:00:07,160 Let me put it this way. I'm ready. Here's the theme. 3 00:00:08,700 --> 00:00:22,600 [music: theme; Mozart, Symphony No. 24 (K 182), 2nd Mvt.; Philharmonic Symphony Orchestra of London/Leinsdorf] 4 00:00:22,600 --> 00:00:30,700 Hello there, I'm Peter Schickele, and this is Schickele Mix, a program dedicated to the proposition that all musics are created equal. 5 00:00:30,960 --> 00:00:35,260 Or as Duke Ellington put it, if it sounds good, it is good. 6 00:00:35,680 --> 00:00:43,160 And here's a good deal. Our bills are paid by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and by the National Endowment for the Arts, 7 00:00:43,400 --> 00:00:46,260 with additional support from the National Academy of 8 00:00:46,260 --> 00:00:52,160 Recording Arts and Sciences, and from this radio station right here, where the fruits of my 9 00:00:52,160 --> 00:00:57,920 Sisyphusian labors go to seed, which seeds are then borne aloft on the winds of PRI, 10 00:00:57,920 --> 00:01:01,700 Public Radio International. Okay, 11 00:01:01,830 --> 00:01:07,250 say we've got this whiz kid who's a terrific pianist and a terrific sight reader, 12 00:01:07,410 --> 00:01:11,970 and he's done a lot of chamber music with strings, so in addition to the treble and 13 00:01:11,970 --> 00:01:38,450 bass clefs, he can read the alto clef that violas use. Now, he doesn't know anything about score reading or instrumentation, but still, he's a fantastic sight reader, so he ought to be able to read the score of Mozart's first symphony, which only has six lines of music. Two oboes on one line, two French horns on another, then first violins, second violins, violas, and then cellos and basses on the bottom line. 14 00:01:38,450 --> 00:01:48,670 Now, as those of you who are regular listeners to this program know, due to the fact that it's one of my favorite pieces, Mozart's first symphony begins like this. 15 00:01:48,870 --> 00:01:51,370 I'm just going to play it on the authentic instrument here. 16 00:01:56,600 --> 00:02:04,340 Now, our whiz kid here, he doesn't have any trouble reading six lines of music at once, but here's what he plays when I put it in front of him. 17 00:02:05,280 --> 00:02:05,760 Now, 18 00:02:10,230 --> 00:02:15,130 he may not know anything about score reading, but he knows that that doesn't sound like Mozart. 19 00:02:15,130 --> 00:02:22,870 The problem is, our whiz kid doesn't know that the French horns are not notated the way they sound. 20 00:02:23,130 --> 00:02:24,570 Mozart wrote this, 21 00:02:28,350 --> 00:02:34,730 knowing that when the horn players played that part, it would come out sounding like this. 22 00:02:39,340 --> 00:02:49,220 That's because the French horn is usually a transposing instrument, which means that the note you write for it has to be different from the note you want to hear. 23 00:02:50,490 --> 00:02:58,530 Transposition is one aspect of musical practice that many lay people find to be not only confusing, but downright perverse. 24 00:02:59,310 --> 00:03:03,090 Why don't composers and arrangers simply write the notes they want to hear? 25 00:03:03,350 --> 00:03:05,450 Why all this obfuscation? 26 00:03:05,570 --> 00:03:08,210 Which is a pretty self-descriptive word, isn't it? 27 00:03:08,410 --> 00:03:12,790 Anyway, the basic answer is to make it easier for the players. 28 00:03:13,090 --> 00:03:14,210 In two ways. 29 00:03:14,210 --> 00:03:21,250 To make it easier to play in different keys, and to make it easier to play all the members of a family of instruments. 30 00:03:21,710 --> 00:03:27,030 For instance there are six different sizes of saxophone that have been in fairly common use: 31 00:03:27,030 --> 00:03:33,490 the so-called C melody saxophone, and then the soprano, alto, tenor, baritone, and bass. 32 00:03:34,030 --> 00:03:36,950 The Four middle ones are the most common these days. 33 00:03:37,430 --> 00:03:42,690 Now if you wanted to play all of them, and composers wrote the exact notes they wanted. 34 00:03:42,690 --> 00:03:58,590 You'd have to learn six different sets of fingerings. A different fingering chart for each instrument. To get middle C on the soprano, for instance, you use everything except your pinkies and your left thumb. It's practically at the bottom of the instrument's range. 35 00:03:59,090 --> 00:04:07,770 But on the baritone, middle C is fairly high in the range of the instrument. You just use two fingers and the thumb of the left hand. Completely different fingerings. 36 00:04:07,770 --> 00:04:12,310 For those of you who like the family of fingering, you'll have to be constantly reminding yourself which size sax you're playing. 37 00:04:12,850 --> 00:04:23,410 But with transposition, any given note on the page always has the same fingering no matter if it's C melody, soprano, alto, tenor, baritone or bass. 38 00:04:23,750 --> 00:04:28,530 And all of them, because of that, are notated in the treble clef, even the bass. 39 00:04:29,350 --> 00:04:32,010 One set of fingerings for the whole family. 40 00:04:37,010 --> 00:04:47,860 Now, if the printed music says Middle C, you slap down everything except your left pinky and thumb, and the transposition takes care of the different ranges. 41 00:04:48,240 --> 00:04:58,000 Very user-friendly for the player, but it does make for tricky score reading, because, as we've observed, what you see is not what you get. 42 00:04:58,000 --> 00:05:08,400 To illustrate this, I've asked some musicians to come up to the studio here. We've got a string quartet and a saxophone quartet. Thanks for dropping by, folks. 43 00:05:08,940 --> 00:05:18,960 Now, I've written a little four-bar melody, and all I did was photocopy it, so exactly the same music is on all eight music stands here in the studio. 44 00:05:19,520 --> 00:05:25,960 It starts on the C above middle C. That's the C of face, you know, F-A-C-E in the treble clef. 45 00:05:26,420 --> 00:05:29,720 It's just a little tune I made up off the top of my head. It goes like this. 46 00:05:30,340 --> 00:05:37,380 [music: keyboard demonstration] 47 00:05:37,380 --> 00:05:40,480 Okay, now let's hear it played by the string quartet. 48 00:05:41,260 --> 00:05:46,540 The viola and cello don't usually play in the treble clef, but they do sometimes, so they're familiar with it. 49 00:05:46,720 --> 00:05:48,160 Okay, folks, if you please. 50 00:05:49,140 --> 00:05:56,650 [music: keyboard demonstration] 51 00:05:56,650 --> 00:05:57,830 Thank you, thank you. 52 00:05:57,910 --> 00:06:03,210 And we could all hear that they were playing exactly the same notes that I played on the authentic instrument. 53 00:06:03,770 --> 00:06:09,130 And I must say that the four of you have a beautiful tone, just a gorgeous string sound. 54 00:06:09,610 --> 00:06:12,390 They call themselves the Midi Quartet, folks. 55 00:06:12,530 --> 00:06:16,910 They're named after an area of southern France, and I think it's a name to remember. 56 00:06:17,110 --> 00:06:19,210 I think we'll be hearing from them for years to come. 57 00:06:19,490 --> 00:06:24,790 Now let's hear the tune, exactly the same music, played by our four saxophonists, 58 00:06:25,330 --> 00:06:27,470 soprano, alto, tenor, bari. 59 00:06:27,550 --> 00:06:28,850 It's the same tune here. 60 00:06:29,120 --> 00:06:34,800 [music: keyboard demonstration] 61 00:06:34,800 --> 00:06:36,060 Okay, folks, let's hear it. 62 00:06:36,980 --> 00:06:45,280 [music: keyboard demonstration] 63 00:06:45,760 --> 00:06:47,100 Completely different notes. 64 00:06:47,420 --> 00:06:49,500 Sort of sounds like Gregorian chant. 65 00:06:49,500 --> 00:07:01,800 And the bizarre thing, score reading-wise speaking, is that we had four different pitch levels going on simultaneously there, but none of them were the pitches as printed on the music paper. 66 00:07:02,260 --> 00:07:16,920 Certain sizes in these instrument families become more popular than others, just because of their tone quality, and the C melody saxophone, which would have given us the original pitches, has, I think, pretty much become extinct, at least for the time being. 67 00:07:17,660 --> 00:07:31,680 [music: keyboard demonstration] 68 00:07:33,620 --> 00:07:36,020 In the 18th 69 00:07:39,200 --> 00:07:44,120 century, which was the spawning ground of the symphony orchestra, wind instruments 70 00:07:44,120 --> 00:07:47,420 The instruments were not as sophisticated in their construction as they are now. 71 00:07:48,180 --> 00:07:52,960 Trumpets and horns had no valves, which meant that they were more or less restricted to 72 00:07:52,960 --> 00:07:55,620 the notes a bugle can play, which 73 00:07:57,980 --> 00:08:01,780 meant if you had a symphony in E flat, say, you used 74 00:08:01,780 --> 00:08:04,980 trumpets that were built to play the notes of an E flat chord. 75 00:08:05,540 --> 00:08:09,080 Well, these trumpets would be useless in a symphony in A major. 76 00:08:09,220 --> 00:08:11,380 None of the notes you'd want would be available. 77 00:08:11,380 --> 00:08:27,580 It's available. So you'd have to have another trumpet for pieces in A. Actually with brasses they usually, instead of having a whole bunch of completely different instruments, they'd simply replace one part of the tubing to reduce or increase the total length of the instrument. 78 00:08:28,100 --> 00:08:37,100 Now lipping, changing the position of the lips in the brass mouthpiece, is to a valveless trumpet player what fingering is to a woodwind player. 79 00:08:37,100 --> 00:08:49,660 So, instead of asking the trumpeters to learn seven different lipping systems, one for each of the seven key signatures from which 18th century composers almost always chose for their symphonies, 80 00:08:49,780 --> 00:09:01,520 it was decided to have the written note C always represent the fundamental tone of the instrument, or one of its octaves, no matter what that tone actually is. 81 00:09:02,200 --> 00:09:14,220 So the relationship among the available notes always looks the same to the player, and the transposition takes care of whatever difference there might be between C and the actual key of the piece. 82 00:09:15,720 --> 00:09:21,200 Similarly, 18th century clarinets had many fewer holes and levers than modern clarinets, 83 00:09:21,660 --> 00:09:26,880 which meant that it was easy to play in the basic key the clarinet was made in and closely related keys, 84 00:09:27,140 --> 00:09:31,240 but quickly got a lot harder when you were in more distant keys. 85 00:09:31,880 --> 00:09:41,500 So, for a symphony in C, you used a clarinet built in C. For a symphony in B flat, a clarinet built in B flat. For a symphony in A, a clarinet built in A. 86 00:09:41,740 --> 00:09:56,420 But again, to avoid making the player learn different fingerings for each instrument, you let him pretend to always be playing in C or some other really easy key, and use transposition to square things away with what the rest of the orchestra is playing. 87 00:09:56,900 --> 00:10:07,540 Basically, you're saying to the string players, who always have to play in whatever key the piece is really in, you're saying, hey, let's face it, he's a clarinetist, right? 88 00:10:08,140 --> 00:10:11,680 I mean, you can't expect him to handle more than one sharp or flat. 89 00:10:12,780 --> 00:10:17,800 It's as if sometime during the 18th century, the devil appeared to Mr. Clarinet and said, 90 00:10:18,700 --> 00:10:21,840 Listen, I've got an offer I think you'll find irresistible. 91 00:10:22,400 --> 00:10:25,440 You've got to trust me on this. It's a no-lose deal for you. 92 00:10:25,440 --> 00:10:35,180 Here's the setup. I'll fix it so you always play in really easy keys. You won't have to sweat like those slumps in the string section. 93 00:10:35,560 --> 00:10:40,440 And all I ask in return, now I know what you're thinking and you're wrong. You can keep your soul. 94 00:10:40,880 --> 00:10:49,580 All I want is the souls of all the thousands of conductors who are going to have to read these transposition-ridden scores over the next few centuries, 95 00:10:49,780 --> 00:10:53,020 and the composers and arrangers who are going to have to write them. 96 00:10:53,620 --> 00:11:12,720 Well, it's a no-brainer, right? What has Mr. Clarinet got to lose? He'd be a fool to turn it down. Now, the interesting thing is that the devil didn't make that offer to Mr. Flute and Mr. Oboe. Or maybe he did, but they, being instruments with a longer history than that of the clarinet, had too much pride to accept it. 97 00:11:12,720 --> 00:11:20,820 Whatever the reason, flutes and oboes are almost always notated at concert pitch, which means what you see is what you get. 98 00:11:21,100 --> 00:11:23,160 Well, except when they're in a family way. 99 00:11:23,260 --> 00:11:28,140 The alto flute and the English horn, which is an alto oboe, are transposing instruments. 100 00:11:28,760 --> 00:11:31,000 And then there's the D-flat piccolo. 101 00:11:31,700 --> 00:11:34,720 Here's the most famous piccolo solo in the world. 102 00:11:34,720 --> 00:12:06,260 [music excerpt: Sousa, "The Stars & Stripes Forever!"; Eastman Wind Ensemble/Hunsberger] 103 00:12:06,260 --> 00:12:13,020 Now, Stars & Stripes Forever!, or that section of it, is in A-flat major, which has four flats in the key signature. 104 00:12:13,020 --> 00:12:14,660 I assume 105 00:12:20,350 --> 00:12:30,490 that a really good piccolo player could play that solo at concert pitch, but it's a whole lot easier a half a step lower in the key of G, which only has one sharp. 106 00:12:31,110 --> 00:12:35,530 So Sousa took pity on the piccoloist. Piccolo-er? 107 00:12:36,250 --> 00:12:42,390 Anyway, he wrote it for piccolo in D flat, which sounds an octave and a half step higher than it's written. 108 00:12:42,390 --> 00:12:47,510 Which means that the piccolist can pretend he or she is playing in the key of G. 109 00:12:48,300 --> 00:12:51,540 But D-flat piccolos aren't usually used in orchestras. 110 00:12:51,620 --> 00:12:55,460 So if you hear Stars & Stripes Forever! played by an orchestra, 111 00:12:55,720 --> 00:13:00,840 the chances are good that the whole piece has been transposed down a half step. 112 00:13:01,340 --> 00:13:03,520 So this section really is in G, 113 00:13:03,640 --> 00:13:08,420 and the piccolo player is playing it the way he practiced it for the band version. 114 00:13:08,540 --> 00:13:09,040 No, he doesn't... 115 00:13:09,040 --> 00:13:10,260 What? What? What? 116 00:13:10,440 --> 00:13:12,080 That's the irrelevancy alarm. 117 00:13:12,640 --> 00:13:34,310 And I am being completely relevant. Okay, wait a minute. It's doing its printout thing here. Okay, let's see what it says here. What's the point? What do you mean, what's the point? Today's show is about transposition and everything I've said has been... Oh man, I can't believe this thing. Talk about attitude. 118 00:13:37,280 --> 00:13:44,720 Okay. What difference does any of this make to someone listening to a piece of music? 119 00:13:44,720 --> 00:13:47,520 Yeah, well, there's the rub. 120 00:13:48,240 --> 00:13:53,820 Aside from the fact that some of the playing might be better because the instruments are in easy keys, 121 00:13:54,460 --> 00:13:58,540 it doesn't make any difference to the audience how instruments are notated. 122 00:13:58,900 --> 00:14:05,160 But I like to think that my listeners are curious enough about the mechanics of music, 123 00:14:05,280 --> 00:14:08,340 the things... Oh, man, what is this? 124 00:14:08,540 --> 00:14:12,480 Is this something personal here? I mean, are you trying to pick a fight or something? 125 00:14:13,360 --> 00:14:14,580 Okay, let's see. 126 00:14:16,010 --> 00:14:26,100 It's time for a program ID. Oh, brother. My name is Peter Schickele, and the program is Schickele Mix from PRI, Public Radio International. 127 00:14:29,370 --> 00:14:36,850 Unless you're a devoted fan of the movie actor Michael Caine, you probably don't know that he has a brother named Robert. 128 00:14:37,350 --> 00:14:43,490 But unlike Michael, Robert only uses his first initial, you know, like the cartoonist R. Crumb. 129 00:14:43,490 --> 00:14:49,590 So he's known as Arcane, which is a good description of the subject of today's program. 130 00:14:50,270 --> 00:14:55,630 We're talking about transposition, and specifically, so far, about transposing instruments. 131 00:14:56,210 --> 00:15:00,790 And what makes it such an arcane subject is that it's hard to understand 132 00:15:00,790 --> 00:15:03,370 if you don't know anything about music theory and notation, 133 00:15:03,630 --> 00:15:08,910 and also, it has so little to do in any direct way with how the music sounds. 134 00:15:09,230 --> 00:15:11,230 It's real backstage stuff. 135 00:15:12,090 --> 00:15:17,710 But that doesn't mean it's uninteresting. At least I, unlike the irrelevancy alarm, don't think so. 136 00:15:18,470 --> 00:15:23,370 My wife and I were once given a tour of a beautiful 18th century opera house in Sweden, 137 00:15:23,450 --> 00:15:28,630 and we got to go beneath the stage and see the machinery for changing the scenery. 138 00:15:29,230 --> 00:15:34,470 And I've been under the stage at Radio City Music Hall, too. I love that behind-the-scenes stuff. 139 00:15:35,250 --> 00:15:41,050 Now, it's true that transposition is beside the point to listeners, even very analytical listeners. 140 00:15:41,050 --> 00:15:46,470 But mastering the Concept is ofgreat importance to conductors and composers. 141 00:15:47,050 --> 00:15:53,990 Here are two brief excerpts that represent extremes in the use of transposing instruments. 142 00:15:54,840 --> 00:16:46,400 [music excerpt: Beethoven, Symphony No. 1, part of the Scherzo; London Classical Players, Norrington] 143 00:16:52,200 --> 00:17:49,000 [music excerpt: Stravinsky, The Rite of Spring, ending; Boston Philharmonic, Zander] 144 00:17:49,400 --> 00:17:55,200 Part of the Scherzo of Beethoven's First Symphony played by Roger Norrington and the London 145 00:17:55,200 --> 00:18:02,020 Classical Players and the end of Stravinsky's The Rite of Spring with the Boston Philharmonic 146 00:18:02,100 --> 00:18:08,100 under the direction of Benjamin Zander, whose father, it sounds like, was in the front row of the audience. 147 00:18:08,280 --> 00:18:13,480 The Beethoven is in the key of C and has no transposing instruments whatsoever. 148 00:18:13,940 --> 00:18:20,000 The clarinets, trumpets, and horns are all in C, which means when it's written C, you're 149 00:18:20,000 --> 00:18:26,180 going to hear C. By the way, when I say that there are no transposing instruments, I'm 150 00:18:26,180 --> 00:18:28,220 ignoring octave transpositions. 151 00:18:28,220 --> 00:18:38,660 I should perhaps mention, for instance, that string basses sound the same note that's written but an octave lower, and the regular piccolo sounds an octave higher than written. 152 00:18:38,820 --> 00:18:41,780 That's essentially because their ranges are so extreme. 153 00:18:41,940 --> 00:18:53,720 The piccolo goes so far above the treble clef and the bass so far below the bass clef that it would be tedious and confusing to write all those ledger lines, those little added staff lines. 154 00:18:54,300 --> 00:19:07,900 Also, with basses, it means that they can double the cellos, that is, they can read the same part the cellos read, but be sounding an octave lower, producing that rich bass line that is characteristic of classical orchestral writing. 155 00:19:08,500 --> 00:19:10,600 Anyway, the Stravinsky, 156 00:19:10,680 --> 00:19:18,580 in contrast to the Beethoven, has 17 transposing instruments, using six different transpositions. 157 00:19:18,580 --> 00:19:42,280 I've got the score here, and in addition to instruments that sound as they're written, we've got an Alto flute and an English horn and a little clarinet in E flat, three B flat clarinets, a bass clarinet in the transposing there, we've got eight horns in F, we've got a little trumpet in D, and we've got a bass trumpet in E flat. 158 00:19:42,280 --> 00:19:50,620 What that means when I say that it's a bass trumpet in E-flat is that if the printed music has a C, you're actually going to hear E-flat. 159 00:19:51,100 --> 00:19:55,380 Okay, now, this makes for really complicated score reading. 160 00:19:55,900 --> 00:20:00,020 Remember I said that Mozart's first symphony was written on six lines of music? 161 00:20:00,320 --> 00:20:07,180 Well, the end of the Stravinsky score here has 29 lines of music, 11 of them for transposing instruments, 162 00:20:07,780 --> 00:20:11,100 which means that the notes you see on the page are not what you're going to hear. 163 00:20:11,300 --> 00:20:19,700 They're using six different transpositions. We've got a musical style that has much less redundancy, harmonically speaking, than Mozart's. 164 00:20:19,800 --> 00:20:22,900 I'm telling you, it's not your average bedtime reading. 165 00:20:23,420 --> 00:20:25,000 You know, it's not your P.D. James. 166 00:20:25,280 --> 00:20:34,180 It got so daunting that some composers, Prokofiev among them, started writing their scores at concert pitch to make them easier to read 167 00:20:34,180 --> 00:20:35,700 In other 168 00:20:40,300 --> 00:20:49,920 words, the individual players had the same transposed parts that they've always had, but the score has the notes that you actually are going to hear. 169 00:20:50,670 --> 00:21:02,850 But you know, being a profoundly lazy soul, it's occurred to me that one could have some fun with this idea of writing out one melody and giving it to differently transposing instruments. 170 00:21:03,830 --> 00:21:33,340 I let the MIDI string quartet and three of the saxophone players go but now I've got six more players here in the studio. We've got seven completely different transpositions represented here now. We've got a D flat piccolo which means a written C is going to sound D flat. We've got a D trumpet which means C is going to actually sound D. An A clarinet written C is going to sound A. An alto flute 171 00:21:33,340 --> 00:21:35,300 A written C is going to sound G. 172 00:21:37,220 --> 00:21:38,780 We've got an English horn. 173 00:21:38,940 --> 00:21:41,060 A written C is going to sound F. 174 00:21:42,600 --> 00:21:46,980 Then we've got our Alto saxophone, written C, sounds E flat. 175 00:21:47,280 --> 00:21:52,740 And then finally a bass clarinet, written C, sounds this B flat. 176 00:21:53,540 --> 00:21:59,320 Okay now, once again, I've written out a little melody, starting on the C above middle C, 177 00:21:59,520 --> 00:22:03,700 and everybody has a photocopy of that melody in front of them. 178 00:22:04,020 --> 00:22:09,100 And also, like before with the saxes, the note you will not hear in the first chord 179 00:22:09,100 --> 00:22:10,340 is the note I wrote, C. 180 00:22:10,340 --> 00:22:15,220 But I'll bet these seven transpositions are going to sound good on this theme. 181 00:22:16,000 --> 00:22:19,780 Okay, folks, let's see. There's so many of us, I think I'd better conduct. 182 00:22:20,040 --> 00:22:20,740 Here we go. 183 00:22:21,360 --> 00:22:51,600 [music: keyboard demonstration, one melody in seven transpositions] 184 00:22:52,020 --> 00:22:53,120 Pretty cool, huh? 185 00:22:53,880 --> 00:22:57,300 Sounds like one of those Stan Kenton charts from the late 40s. 186 00:22:57,940 --> 00:22:59,440 House of Formica. 187 00:23:00,180 --> 00:23:02,940 Hey, I thought of another possible use of this technique. 188 00:23:03,440 --> 00:23:10,100 What if Bela Bartok had written his Concerto for Orchestra a decade earlier than he actually did? 189 00:23:10,100 --> 00:23:11,540 I can 190 00:23:14,040 --> 00:23:21,420 imagine somebody at the Disney studio thinking that the second movement, the games of the couples, might be good film fodder. 191 00:23:22,220 --> 00:23:27,220 That's the piece in which pairs of wind instruments play at a set interval from each other. 192 00:23:27,360 --> 00:23:39,760 The bassoons are always a minor sixth apart, the oboes a minor third, the clarinets a minor seventh, the flutes a perfect fifth, and finally, the trumpets at a major second from each other. 193 00:23:40,100 --> 00:23:48,800 So here, in a Schickele Mix exclusive, is the world premiere of a radio pseudo-docu-dramatic reenactment 194 00:23:48,800 --> 00:24:02,300 [music excerpt: Bartok, Concerto for Orchestra; Los Angeles Philharmonic Orchestra/Previn] 195 00:24:02,400 --> 00:24:04,960 Our scene takes place in a large recording studio. 196 00:24:05,670 --> 00:24:11,180 In the studio proper, we see the Philadelphia Orchestra and, on the podium, its conductor, Leopold Stokowski. 197 00:24:12,080 --> 00:24:19,960 In the control room are Walt Disney, Bela Bartok, a recording engineer, and the music producer, Cliff Cleff. 198 00:24:20,010 --> 00:24:21,970 Known in the trade as Trouble 199 00:24:21,970 --> 00:24:24,770 As we join them, Clef is speaking 200 00:24:25,210 --> 00:24:27,210 Okay, now the only thing we've got left to record today 201 00:24:27,210 --> 00:24:28,550 Is the section with the two trumpets 202 00:24:28,550 --> 00:24:30,250 Where they're playing at parallel seconds 203 00:24:30,250 --> 00:24:32,230 You know, one step apart from each other 204 00:24:32,230 --> 00:24:34,070 So it sounds wrong but cute, you know what I mean? 205 00:24:34,290 --> 00:24:37,450 Mr. Disney, this is the scene with the two wombats 206 00:24:37,450 --> 00:24:39,930 You know, where the boy wombat is putting the make on the girl 207 00:24:39,930 --> 00:24:41,130 And she's playing hard to get 208 00:24:41,130 --> 00:24:42,610 You know, he tries to tickle her 209 00:24:42,610 --> 00:24:43,810 And she pushes him off a cliff 210 00:24:43,810 --> 00:24:44,890 He goes to kiss her 211 00:24:44,890 --> 00:24:46,250 She ducks behind a hornet's nest 212 00:24:46,250 --> 00:24:47,770 You know, but in the end of the scene 213 00:24:47,770 --> 00:24:48,790 They're in a clinch 214 00:24:48,790 --> 00:24:52,730 and the butterflies are flying around them, you know, in the shape of a heart. Okay, let's do this. 215 00:24:53,260 --> 00:24:55,280 We're almost out of time, so, who are you? 216 00:24:56,560 --> 00:24:59,300 Uh, I'm the music librarian, yup yup yup yup 217 00:24:59,300 --> 00:25:00,160 Yeah, so? 218 00:25:01,680 --> 00:25:03,820 Well, I'm afraid we've got a bit of a problem 219 00:25:03,820 --> 00:25:05,920 A bit of a problem? I don't like problems 220 00:25:05,920 --> 00:25:08,260 Let me tell you, pal, if I've got a problem, you've got a problem 221 00:25:08,260 --> 00:25:11,320 They don't call me Trouble Clef for nothing, so what is the problem? 222 00:25:12,140 --> 00:25:15,740 Well, uh, we can't find the first trumpet part, nope nope nope 223 00:25:15,740 --> 00:25:17,860 Ah, wait a minute, wait a minute, hold on here 224 00:25:17,860 --> 00:25:21,720 You're telling me that we're doing a section featuring the two trumpets 225 00:25:21,720 --> 00:25:23,160 And you, what's your name? 226 00:25:23,420 --> 00:25:24,860 Uh, Mortimer. 227 00:25:25,380 --> 00:25:26,940 You're the music librarian, right, Mortimer? 228 00:25:27,080 --> 00:25:28,460 And you can't find the trumpet parts? 229 00:25:28,620 --> 00:25:30,860 Uh, just the first trumpet part, sir. 230 00:25:30,980 --> 00:25:32,580 We got the second trumpet part. 231 00:25:32,920 --> 00:25:34,820 Okay, I'll deal with you later. 232 00:25:34,960 --> 00:25:36,160 We're almost out of time here. 233 00:25:36,240 --> 00:25:38,520 Bela, baby, how long is it going to take 234 00:25:38,520 --> 00:25:40,460 to copy out the first trumpet part from the score? 235 00:25:41,960 --> 00:25:43,660 That won't be necessary. 236 00:25:44,520 --> 00:25:46,320 Uh, what do you mean it won't be necessary? 237 00:25:46,440 --> 00:25:47,900 We got to have both trumpets playing. 238 00:25:47,900 --> 00:25:52,500 The second trumpet part will suffice. 239 00:25:53,000 --> 00:25:56,060 Hey, little baby, I got to figure you know what you're talking about. 240 00:25:56,200 --> 00:25:57,380 But how's that going to work? 241 00:25:57,920 --> 00:25:58,980 Okay, actually, wait a minute. 242 00:25:59,000 --> 00:25:59,580 Don't tell me. 243 00:25:59,600 --> 00:26:00,500 Tell the trumpet players. 244 00:26:00,720 --> 00:26:03,620 Just push that talkback button, and they'll hear you out in the studio. 245 00:26:05,170 --> 00:26:08,170 Both players play off the same part. 246 00:26:09,030 --> 00:26:13,250 The second player plays on the B-flat trumpet. 247 00:26:14,110 --> 00:26:18,110 And the first player uses the C-trombet. 248 00:26:18,730 --> 00:26:19,850 Okay, you heard him, fellas. 249 00:26:19,950 --> 00:26:20,370 Let's do it. 250 00:26:20,450 --> 00:26:22,490 Now, you start at the place that's indicated. 251 00:26:22,490 --> 00:26:25,390 We'll fade you up in here, and then we'll let you know when we fade it out. 252 00:26:25,750 --> 00:26:26,910 Stokey Baby, take it away. 253 00:26:27,640 --> 00:27:27,600 [music excerpt: Bartok, Concerto for Orchestra; Los Angeles Philharmonic Orchestra/Previn] 254 00:27:27,600 --> 00:27:28,960 That sounds like a rap to me. 255 00:27:29,300 --> 00:27:31,120 Bela Bubala, you saved the day. 256 00:27:31,220 --> 00:27:33,460 I mean, you saved Mr. Disney here a lot of money. 257 00:27:33,540 --> 00:27:35,380 Money he can ill afford to squander. 258 00:27:35,580 --> 00:27:39,800 Hey, everybody, I think we ought to thank our musical friend here in a musical way. 259 00:27:41,280 --> 00:27:43,840 Oh, Lordy, pick a Bela Bartok. 260 00:27:44,220 --> 00:27:47,040 Oh, Lordy, pick a Bela. 261 00:27:47,060 --> 00:27:47,820 Hey, come on, guys. 262 00:27:47,820 --> 00:28:22,620 [music excerpt: Bartok, Concerto for Orchestra; Los Angeles Philharmonic Orchestra/Previn] 263 00:28:25,540 --> 00:28:26,320 Perfectly plausible. 264 00:28:27,390 --> 00:28:34,890 That was actually in this radio pseudo-docudramatic reenactment, Andre Previn and the L.A. Philharmonic. 265 00:28:35,520 --> 00:28:42,420 One of the most amazing transposition stories I've heard concerns a recording of the Stravinsky Septet. 266 00:28:42,960 --> 00:28:46,180 Now, I wasn't there myself, folks, so I can't swear to this. 267 00:28:46,180 --> 00:28:49,320 But as I heard it, Stravinsky was at the session. 268 00:28:49,500 --> 00:29:03,040 He was getting pretty old by then, and the Septet is a work that was written when he was becoming more and more influenced by the atonal and highly serialized, highly mathematically oriented music of Anton Webern. 269 00:29:03,460 --> 00:29:06,340 For some reason, they recorded the last movement first. 270 00:29:06,340 --> 00:29:16,980 Except for the cadences at the ends of the sections, this is a spiky, highly chromatic piece that doesn't have a sense of being in any particular key. 271 00:29:17,280 --> 00:29:17,700 This 272 00:29:17,700 --> 00:32:29,200 [music excerpt: Stravinsky, "Septet"; European Soloists Ensemble/Ashkenazy] 273 00:32:29,770 --> 00:32:35,510 is the gig from Stravinsky's Septet, played by the European Soloists Ensemble. 274 00:32:36,240 --> 00:32:39,700 This is not, by the way, the recording that this anecdote is about. 275 00:32:39,920 --> 00:32:46,420 Going back to the session in the anecdote, having done that last movement, they turned to the first movement. 276 00:32:46,420 --> 00:32:55,620 Now, the first movement of the septet is very neoclassical, not only rhythmically, like the last movement, but melodically and harmonically as well. 277 00:32:56,260 --> 00:33:04,660 Unlike the tonal thicket of the Sieg, the first movement begins in a clear key, with everybody playing the note A. 278 00:33:05,360 --> 00:33:19,290 [music excerpt: Stravinsky, "Septet"; European Soloists Ensemble/Ashkenazy] 279 00:33:19,290 --> 00:33:27,870 Well, going back to the session of our story, as soon as he played the first note, and it wasn't a unison with everybody else, 280 00:33:27,870 --> 00:33:33,670 The clarinetist realized with horror that he was using the wrong clarinet. 281 00:33:34,250 --> 00:33:39,870 He was playing his B-flat clarinet, and he should have been playing his A clarinet all along, 282 00:33:40,110 --> 00:33:46,670 which meant that every single note he had played in the G in the last movement was wrong. 283 00:33:47,250 --> 00:33:51,430 But nobody, including the composer, had noticed or had said anything. 284 00:33:52,200 --> 00:33:55,020 So he switched clarinets, and they did the first movement, 285 00:33:55,020 --> 00:33:59,200 and at the break, he took the producer aside and told him what had happened. 286 00:33:59,840 --> 00:34:03,260 The producer thought a bit and then went back into the control room. 287 00:34:03,620 --> 00:34:07,660 He told Stravinsky that they'd had a technical problem with the equipment 288 00:34:07,660 --> 00:34:12,240 and the tape of the gig wouldn't be usable, so they'd have to record it again. 289 00:34:13,390 --> 00:34:15,730 Remember, you didn't hear it here first. 290 00:34:16,730 --> 00:34:22,170 Now, to give you an idea of how very wrong that should have sounded to the composer, 291 00:34:22,170 --> 00:34:25,250 If the story is true, let's listen to the. 292 00:34:25,320 --> 00:34:29,120 The first entrance of the soloist in Mozart's clarinet concerto. 293 00:34:29,120 --> 00:35:32,920 [music excerpt: Mozart, Clarinet Concerto in A (K 622); Keith Dwyer/Stuttgart Festival Orchestra/Kahn] 294 00:35:32,920 --> 00:35:58,500 That was Keith Dwyer and the Stuttgart Festival Orchestra conducted by Emil Kahn. Now, the Mozart Concerto is also for A clarinet. As a matter of fact, Mozart originally called the piece Take the A clarinet. Just kidding there, folks. It's also for A clarinet. Now, what if Keith Dwyer had mistakenly taken out his B-flat clarinet for the session instead of the A? 295 00:35:59,080 --> 00:36:01,820 This is what it would have sounded like. 296 00:36:01,820 --> 00:37:05,380 [music: Mozart, Clarinet Concerto in A (K. 622), opening, doctored by Schickele: the solo replayed on the keyboard a half step off] 297 00:37:05,380 --> 00:37:32,270 If Mozart had been in the control room, do you think he would have noticed? That, of course, was not Keith Dwyer playing this time. That I did with the help of the authentic instrument. His tone is certainly a lot better than that of the authentic instrument in this case. Anyway, the implication of the Stravinsky story, of course, is not only that he was getting to be a bit over the hill, but that he didn't hear his newer atonal music in his head 298 00:37:32,270 --> 00:37:36,130 as accurately or as well as he heard his older stuff. 299 00:37:36,390 --> 00:37:38,310 Nor did the producer, for that matter. 300 00:37:38,810 --> 00:37:40,970 Nor did I, but of course I wasn't there. 301 00:37:41,290 --> 00:37:43,790 But I'm here, and I'm still Peter Schickele. 302 00:37:44,090 --> 00:37:48,890 And the program is still Schickele Mix from PRI, Public Radio International. 303 00:37:50,590 --> 00:37:54,730 Our show today is called What You See Is Not What You Get. 304 00:37:54,930 --> 00:37:56,970 We're talking about transposition. 305 00:37:57,770 --> 00:38:00,070 Another story involving transposition, 306 00:38:00,070 --> 00:38:02,630 It seems too good to be true to me, but who knows, 307 00:38:03,240 --> 00:38:11,480 is about the orchestra that was playing Mozart's G minor Symphony under a guest conductor who, they suspected, really had a tin ear. 308 00:38:11,900 --> 00:38:14,260 Here's the way Symphony No. 40 starts. 309 00:38:15,000 --> 00:39:14,060 [music excerpt: Mozart, Symphony No. 40 in G minor (K. 550), opening; Prague Chamber Orchestra, Mackerras] 310 00:39:14,230 --> 00:39:20,370 Okay, so the orchestra gets together and decides to pull a trick on this conductor and see if he notices. 311 00:39:21,250 --> 00:39:23,410 You know, there's that place where it builds up, 312 00:39:24,930 --> 00:39:30,430 and then a pause before the second theme. 313 00:39:30,430 --> 00:39:41,370 So, the orchestra agreed that everybody would play their part one half-step lower than it was written until they got to the second theme, then they'd play it as written. 314 00:39:41,830 --> 00:39:51,110 The effect is that the music shifts up a half-step, but because that shift happens, as it were, during the pause, they thought he might not notice. 315 00:39:51,550 --> 00:39:53,030 Well, would you? 316 00:39:53,740 --> 00:40:37,400 [music excerpt: Mozart, Symphony No. 40 in G minor (K. 550), opening; Academy of Ancient Music, Schröder, Hogwood] 317 00:40:38,600 --> 00:40:51,000 [music excerpt: Mozart, Symphony No. 40 in G minor (K. 550), opening; Prague Chamber Orchestra, Mackerras] 318 00:40:51,300 --> 00:40:54,560 Now, the trouble with that story is that I don't know how it turned out. 319 00:40:54,560 --> 00:41:06,160 I don't know whether he noticed it or not, and as a matter of fact, I'm not sure I believe the story, because to get a whole orchestra to play really perfectly, transposing its sight, well, maybe they could do it. 320 00:41:06,260 --> 00:41:07,460 Anyway, it's a good story. 321 00:41:08,300 --> 00:41:11,580 Actually, that shift wasn't a full-blooded half-step. 322 00:41:11,940 --> 00:41:22,200 What I did for that prank was use an original instruments recording for the beginning, because tuning A was almost a half-step lower in Mozart's day than it is now. 323 00:41:22,200 --> 00:41:26,800 And then I shifted to a modern instrument's performance for the second theme. 324 00:41:27,220 --> 00:41:33,320 Here's a very clear comparison between Mozart's tuning level and today's. 325 00:41:33,860 --> 00:41:49,600 [music excerpt: Mozart, Symphony No. 41 in C (K. 551); Academy of Ancient Music, Schröder, Hogwood] 326 00:41:52,800 --> 00:42:09,500 [music excerpt: Mozart, Symphony No. 41 in C (K. 551); Chicago Symphony Orchestra, Levine] 327 00:42:09,740 --> 00:42:14,700 So, not only do composers use transposition, so does history. 328 00:42:15,700 --> 00:42:22,180 Basically, what transposition means is that you keep the relationships among the notes constant, 329 00:42:22,280 --> 00:42:25,460 but you start on a different pitch level. 330 00:42:25,920 --> 00:42:45,710 [music excerpt: Mozart, Symphony No. 41 in C (K. 551); Chicago Symphony Orchestra, Levine] 331 00:42:45,710 --> 00:42:49,050 You know, it's sort of like Napoleon on an escalator. 332 00:42:49,330 --> 00:42:53,270 Seen from the ground, he gets higher or lower, but he's always Napoleon. 333 00:42:55,650 --> 00:43:04,170 That may be the worst analogy since Aristophanes compared playing a slot machine to eating a roll of Necco wafers. 334 00:43:04,910 --> 00:43:12,670 Anyway, one job description that often includes the ability to transpose on demand is song accompanist. 335 00:43:13,350 --> 00:43:15,850 Singers find a song too high or too low. 336 00:43:15,850 --> 00:43:21,490 They want it in a key that's comfortable for them. And some pianists are very adept at 337 00:43:21,490 --> 00:43:27,950 playing a song in any key you ask for, sometimes even a song they've never read before. Now some 338 00:43:27,950 --> 00:43:33,910 people object to that practice in classical music. I think I read somewhere that Ezra Pound was one 339 00:43:33,910 --> 00:43:39,230 of them. They feel that the character of the song, the piano part, as well as the voice part, 340 00:43:39,230 --> 00:43:45,810 changes too much when moved up or down are you one of them here's the same song 341 00:43:45,810 --> 00:43:50,450 sung twice the second time a major third lower than the first 342 00:43:51,520 --> 00:46:47,400 [music: Strauss, "Allerseelen," Op. 10, in E-flat major; Barbara Hendricks, Wolfgang Sawallisch] 343 00:46:54,600 --> 00:49:45,200 [music: Strauss, "Allerseelen," Op. 10, in B major; Brigitte Fassbaender, Irwin Gage] 344 00:49:50,680 --> 00:50:07,320 Richard Strauss. The song is called Allerseelen, All Souls' Day, and it was sung first in E-flat major by Barbara Hendricks with Wolfgang Sawallisch at the piano, and then by Brigitte Fassbaender in B major, accompanied by Irwin Gage. 345 00:50:08,020 --> 00:50:17,100 Well, don't look at me. I'm not sure how I feel about this business of transposing art songs. I think the people who care most probably have perfect pitch, which I don't. 346 00:50:17,360 --> 00:50:30,580 By the way, these days, of course, they have computers to transpose. There are music stores where you can tell the machine what song you want the sheet music for and what key you want it in, and the machine does the transposition and prints it out. 347 00:50:31,080 --> 00:50:34,740 Of course, there are older, simpler transposing machines, too. 348 00:50:35,240 --> 00:50:38,580 If you've ever seen a folk guitarist put a capo on her guitar, 349 00:50:38,800 --> 00:50:42,780 you know, a bar that fits across the strings with a clamp to hold it in place, 350 00:50:42,940 --> 00:50:44,940 you've seen a transposing device. 351 00:50:45,540 --> 00:50:50,560 It enables her to play a song in some ridiculously difficult key like F sharp major, 352 00:50:50,800 --> 00:50:54,500 but do the fingerings as if it were in a nice, friendly D major. 353 00:50:55,160 --> 00:50:58,000 And Irving Berlin, who only played in one key, 354 00:50:58,100 --> 00:51:10,800 had a piano with a sort of gear shift mechanism that allowed him to make the piano sound in whatever key he wanted for that song, even though he himself never budged from his usual key on the keyboard. 355 00:51:10,880 --> 00:51:13,820 I think it's in the Smithsonian now, that piano. 356 00:51:14,300 --> 00:51:18,080 So in other words, I think he always played on the black keys in F sharp major. 357 00:51:18,320 --> 00:51:21,340 So in other words, if he played this... 358 00:51:23,460 --> 00:51:32,600 [music: keyboard demonstration] 359 00:51:32,660 --> 00:51:36,700 He could shift his little gear thing there and make it sound like this. 360 00:51:37,540 --> 00:51:52,900 [music: theme; Mozart, Symphony No. 24 (K 182), 2nd Mvt.; Philharmonic Symphony Orchestra of London/Leinsdorf] 361 00:51:52,900 --> 00:52:18,940 That's Schickele Mix. No, wait a minute. Let me transpose that up a bit. And that's Schickele Mix for this week. Our program is made possible with funds provided by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and by the National Endowment for the Arts, with additional support from the National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences, and by this radio station. 362 00:52:20,020 --> 00:52:26,300 We'll tell you in a moment how you can get an official playlist of all the music on today's program with album numbers and everything. 363 00:52:26,520 --> 00:52:31,200 Just refer to the program number. This is program number 142. 364 00:52:31,840 --> 00:52:38,200 And this is Peter Schickele saying goodbye and reminding you that it don't mean a thing if it ain't got that certain je ne sais quoi. 365 00:52:38,520 --> 00:52:40,800 You're looking good. See you next week. 366 00:52:41,580 --> 00:57:50,020 [music: theme; Mozart, Symphony No. 24 (K 182), 2nd Mvt.; Philharmonic Symphony Orchestra of London/Leinsdorf] 367 00:57:53,490 --> 00:57:58,490 If you'd like a copy of that playlist I mentioned, send a stamped self-addressed envelope to Schickele Mix. 368 00:57:58,490 --> 00:58:05,510 That's Schickele, Schickele Mix. Care of Public Radio International, 369 00:58:05,910 --> 00:58:11,850 100 North 6th Street, Suite 900A, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55403. 370 00:58:14,660 --> 00:58:17,880 [announcer:] PRI, Public Radio International.