1
00:00:00,660 --> 00:00:09,160
And you're listening to PRI Programs on KSUI, 91.7 FM, Classical Radio, KSUI in Iowa City.

2
00:00:09,860 --> 00:00:22,890
6 o'clock is the time. Coming your way next, Peter Schickele and Schickele Mix. Peter, are you ready to go? And I do believe he is.

3
00:00:23,600 --> 00:00:27,960
I cannot tell a lie, so I won't answer that. Here's the theme.

4
00:00:29,740 --> 00:00:43,220
[music: theme; Mozart, Symphony No. 24 (K 182), 2nd Mvt.; Philharmonic Symphony Orchestra of London/Leinsdorf]

5
00:00:43,220 --> 00:00:51,380
Hello there! I'm Peter Schickele. And this is Schickele Mix, a program dedicated to the proposition that all musics are created equal.

6
00:00:51,740 --> 00:00:56,200
Or as Duke Ellington put it, if it sounds good, it is good.

7
00:00:56,500 --> 00:00:59,200
And it's always good to know that your bills are paid.

8
00:00:59,620 --> 00:01:05,240
Ours are paid by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and by the National Endowment for the Arts,

9
00:01:05,360 --> 00:01:09,340
with additional support from the National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences,

10
00:01:09,340 --> 00:01:24,700
And last, but not in the least least, from this brave radio station, where I am provided with a studio and enough rope to hang my ideas out to dry before they are borne aloft by the distributive winds of PRI, Public Radio International.

11
00:01:26,060 --> 00:01:36,560
You know, I don't want to complain about the studio they give me here, it's a great place and I'm glad to be able to use it, but there is one thing about it and that's that you can't turn the phone off.

12
00:01:36,560 --> 00:01:42,420
And you regular listeners know that it does sometimes make for interruptions.

13
00:01:42,760 --> 00:01:49,300
Last week, my friend Laurie called up practically at the top of the show, and, well, we ended up gabbing

14
00:01:49,300 --> 00:01:50,640
for the better part of an hour.

15
00:01:51,080 --> 00:01:55,960
But just in case the station manager is listening, I'd like to point out, sir, that it was her

16
00:01:55,960 --> 00:01:56,260
nickel.

17
00:01:56,920 --> 00:01:59,480
Laurie is a very good amateur pianist.

18
00:01:59,640 --> 00:02:06,960
She studied at a conservatory and she loves playing, but, well, she took everything they told her at school as gospel.

19
00:02:07,580 --> 00:02:14,080
And, I mean, she's a terrific person. She's one of my oldest friends, but there is something of the Puritan in her.

20
00:02:14,160 --> 00:02:19,560
And when you combine that with where she studied, not many people have heard of her school.

21
00:02:19,620 --> 00:02:21,120
It's in San Gabriel, California.

22
00:02:21,460 --> 00:02:25,360
It's called the General George S. Patton Conservatory of Music,

23
00:02:25,480 --> 00:02:30,120
and they have a very strict approach to musical interpretation, to put it mildly.

24
00:02:30,120 --> 00:02:44,660
Anyway, Laurie's met this guy, he's a violist and she really likes him, but they've played music together and she worries that his rather romantic playing style is a sign of terminal decadence, or at least mental fungus.

25
00:02:45,260 --> 00:02:52,020
And I've tried to convince her that there are times when it's okay for string players to be a little loose with intonation.

26
00:02:52,120 --> 00:02:56,960
And there are times when sliding from one note to another can be effective and affecting.

27
00:02:56,960 --> 00:03:01,720
There are times when having some roughness in your tone is emotionally appropriate.

28
00:03:02,560 --> 00:03:04,100
And another thing...

29
00:03:04,700 --> 00:03:08,480
That's right, I have more to say on this subject, even if Laurie isn't listening.

30
00:03:09,400 --> 00:03:14,260
Actually, I've tried to call her a couple of times this week, but she's never home, which I take to be a good sign.

31
00:03:14,880 --> 00:03:16,460
But let's talk about ensemble.

32
00:03:17,160 --> 00:03:22,660
In school, if you play in a group or sing in a chorus, they're always drilling you about being together.

33
00:03:22,660 --> 00:03:31,240
I remember a conductor who in rehearsals wouldn't go beyond the first measure until everyone came in together, even if it took 20 starts.

34
00:03:31,740 --> 00:03:39,780
Now that's fine. Ensemble is important. And it can even be thrilling to hear really tight ensemble work from a large aggregation.

35
00:03:39,860 --> 00:03:46,620
I'm not saying that groups should turn their collective backs on the exhilarating sting of synchronicity.

36
00:03:46,620 --> 00:03:52,140
We're not the police, and sometimes following the letter of the law is not the most expressive

37
00:03:52,140 --> 00:03:52,940
way to go.

38
00:03:53,700 --> 00:03:58,600
Listen to this recording of Mischa Elman, one of the great violinists of the first half

39
00:03:58,600 --> 00:03:59,560
of the 20th century.

40
00:04:00,120 --> 00:04:06,480
This is just two people, violin and piano, but if you listen carefully, and by the way,

41
00:04:06,480 --> 00:04:12,640
on this program, if you want to extract the absolutely maximum amount of hard-won wisdom

42
00:04:13,000 --> 00:04:20,920
from the observations of your omniscient intellectual guide and companion, you sometimes have to not listen for enjoyment.

43
00:04:21,040 --> 00:04:27,180
You have to focus very narrowly on the matter at hand. If you want to enjoy music, you can go

44
00:04:27,180 --> 00:04:36,400
somewhere else. There are plenty of places you can go to enjoy music. Gin mills, football fields, elevators.

45
00:04:36,500 --> 00:04:42,460
But anyway, in this excerpt, if you listen very carefully, you'll notice

46
00:04:42,460 --> 00:04:45,400
that the violin and the piano are almost never together.

47
00:04:45,980 --> 00:04:50,420
It's not so obvious at first, but a little bit into the song, the violin and the piano

48
00:04:50,420 --> 00:04:53,060
are changing notes every beat, sort of like a hymn.

49
00:04:53,320 --> 00:04:57,940
And on practically every note, the violin comes in ahead of the piano.

50
00:04:59,080 --> 00:05:50,380
[music excerpt: Mendelssohn, "O For the Wings of a Dove"; Mischa Elman]

51
00:05:50,380 --> 00:05:56,780
Part of a transcription of a Mendelssohn song, O For the Wings of a Dove, played by Mischa

52
00:05:56,780 --> 00:05:59,040
Elman and Marcel van Gool.

53
00:05:59,660 --> 00:06:03,260
So why does Elman keep jumping the gun on the pianist?

54
00:06:03,260 --> 00:06:06,000
Is the pianist coming in late all the time?

55
00:06:06,140 --> 00:06:08,200
Are they incapable of getting it together?

56
00:06:08,500 --> 00:06:09,440
Of course not.

57
00:06:09,960 --> 00:06:13,260
Mischa could play exactly together with Marcel if he wanted to.

58
00:06:13,720 --> 00:06:16,380
But there are two reasons he doesn't want to.

59
00:06:16,800 --> 00:06:21,680
One of them has to do with being a prima donna, or, if you prefer, a primo donno.

60
00:06:22,160 --> 00:06:25,720
I went to a concert of Elman's once when I was a teenager in Fargo.

61
00:06:25,820 --> 00:06:31,300
I can't pretend to remember it in detail, but I do remember that Beethoven's Kreutzer Sonata was on the program.

62
00:06:31,300 --> 00:06:50,100
The slow movement of that piece is a theme in variations, and the first variation is very definitely in the pianist's hands. All the violinist has is little repeated note figures that are incontestably accompanimental. Here's a bit of it played by Pinchas Zukerman and Marc Neikrug.

63
00:06:50,820 --> 00:07:14,130
[music excerpt: Beethoven, Sonata No. 9, Opus 47 (“Kreutzer”); Pinchas Zukerman]

64
00:07:14,130 --> 00:07:20,810
Now, Pinchas Zukerman acknowledges that his part is accompanimental and plays it lightly and in the background.

65
00:07:20,810 --> 00:07:38,810
But not Mischa Elman, no way Jose. His supposedly accompanimental repeated note figures were right out in front, loud and clear, and he was emoting, grimacing, and sighing and bobbing around as if he were playing the cadenza of a romantic violin concerto.

66
00:07:39,310 --> 00:07:48,730
Similarly, starting a supposedly synchronous note a fraction of a second before the pianist quite literally keeps you out in front.

67
00:07:48,730 --> 00:07:53,530
It keeps the spotlight on you, and that's something that Elman knew a lot about.

68
00:07:53,910 --> 00:07:58,270
But it isn't the only reason he shunned precision when it came to ensemble.

69
00:07:58,850 --> 00:08:05,210
Elman was a romantic violinist through and through, and to a real romantic, tidiness

70
00:08:05,210 --> 00:08:05,990
is a sin.

71
00:08:07,130 --> 00:08:13,420
Now nobody, even in today's comparatively straitlaced classical music world, plays

72
00:08:13,420 --> 00:08:32,180
a piece exactly as it appears on the page with respect to tempo, dynamics, and ensemble. But players in the 19th century Romantic tradition were especially free of restraint. They wanted to project a sense of unfettered emotion and precise coordination smacked of fetters.

73
00:08:33,180 --> 00:08:42,400
This was true even when only a single performer was involved. Here are two performances of the same Chopin prelude, both by very able pianists.

74
00:08:43,420 --> 00:08:49,520
Listen very carefully to the coordination between each pianist's right hand and left hand.

75
00:08:50,020 --> 00:08:55,860
For most of this piece, every note in the melody begins on paper simultaneously with

76
00:08:55,860 --> 00:08:57,480
an accompaniment note in the left hand.

77
00:08:57,840 --> 00:09:01,160
And the first pianist we'll hear sticks pretty closely to that.

78
00:09:01,540 --> 00:09:06,900
But the second pianist hardly ever begins notes simultaneously in both hands.

79
00:09:07,460 --> 00:09:14,720
It's not that he couldn't play them together, it's just that doing so would have been against his religion, which was romanticism.

80
00:09:15,480 --> 00:11:27,160
[music excerpt: Chopin, 24 Preludes, Opus 28, No. 4; Grigory Sokolov]

81
00:11:37,180 --> 00:13:37,240
[music excerpt: Chopin, 24 Preludes, Opus 28, No. 4 (Bolet at Carnegie Hall); Jorge Bolet]

82
00:13:38,980 --> 00:13:47,540
Chopin's Prelude in E Minor, Opus 28, No. 4, played first by Grigory Sokolov and then by Jorge Bolet.

83
00:13:48,180 --> 00:13:56,800
But not letting your right hand know what your left hand is doing, as it were, is small potatoes compared to what romantic conductors used to do.

84
00:13:57,040 --> 00:14:03,240
They would make large cuts in pieces, they would reorchestrate passages, and even rewrite notes.

85
00:14:03,240 --> 00:14:11,380
But they're all pikers, in the cavalier treatment of the printed page department, compared to pop, folk, and jazz musicians.

86
00:14:11,900 --> 00:14:17,060
In the non-classical world, most performers wouldn't be caught dead doing a song exactly

87
00:14:17,060 --> 00:14:20,920
as it's written, nor would the song's composer expect them to do so.

88
00:14:21,480 --> 00:14:24,880
Pop songs are generally notated in one of two ways.

89
00:14:25,240 --> 00:14:31,160
The composer, or someone working for him, writes the song down in a very simple, straightforward way,

90
00:14:31,220 --> 00:14:37,540
or if a singer-songwriter has recorded a song, somebody might be hired to write the song down as performed.

91
00:14:38,080 --> 00:14:45,340
In either case, it's assumed that another artist will take considerable liberties, especially in terms of rhythm.

92
00:14:46,100 --> 00:14:52,140
It took me, as a classically trained musician, quite a long time to learn to relax about

93
00:14:52,140 --> 00:14:54,280
notating my non-classical songs.

94
00:14:55,120 --> 00:14:59,480
I have to admit that they're not covered by other artists very often, but when they are,

95
00:14:59,480 --> 00:15:02,920
there's no reason they should be sung exactly as I sing them.

96
00:15:03,420 --> 00:15:08,500
You know, I've had occasion to be in a certain hotel in a nearby town several times recently

97
00:15:08,500 --> 00:15:13,340
to, uh, well, the reason's not important, but the last time I was there, I snuck a

98
00:15:13,340 --> 00:15:18,620
little tape recorder into the cocktail lounge, because they have someone there who has got

99
00:15:18,620 --> 00:15:23,280
to be the dweebiest pianist in the history of piano-dom.

100
00:15:23,280 --> 00:15:37,480
The sign at the entrance to the lounge says, The Piano Stylings of Mr. S. And I have to figure that the S stands for square. In fact, they should write his initial with a little 2 above it and to the right of it.

101
00:15:37,900 --> 00:15:47,360
I'm going to play you his rendition of Fool's Rush In. Now, I have the sheet music for Fool's Rush In, and he plays it exactly as written.

102
00:15:47,360 --> 00:15:54,160
He doesn't swing any of the eighth notes, and the last notes of the phrases fall right on the downbeats as written.

103
00:15:54,620 --> 00:15:57,440
Then I'll play Frank Sinatra's version of the song.

104
00:15:57,940 --> 00:16:00,560
Now here again, you've got to listen very narrowly.

105
00:16:00,580 --> 00:16:06,420
Listen carefully to the bass, which plays mostly on the strong beats, and Sinatra's voice.

106
00:16:07,240 --> 00:16:10,600
Unlike Elman, Frank is usually behind the beat.

107
00:16:11,020 --> 00:16:14,120
The album is called Nice and Easy, after all.

108
00:16:14,120 --> 00:16:19,600
And on the last notes of phrases, he'll sometimes be almost two beats late.

109
00:16:20,180 --> 00:16:25,080
In fact, on the first time through the song before the instrumental interlude, the only

110
00:16:25,080 --> 00:16:30,080
time he lands on the downbeat right with the orchestra is on the very last note.

111
00:16:30,300 --> 00:16:31,920
Pretty satisfying, actually.

112
00:16:32,420 --> 00:16:37,180
And notice that in the interlude, the flute and celesta play the melody very straight,

113
00:16:37,360 --> 00:16:43,340
like Mr. Square Squared, really, but here it has the effect of contrasting nicely with

114
00:16:43,420 --> 00:16:49,160
the singer's very free rendition, Fools rush in, not once, but twice.

115
00:16:50,520 --> 00:18:30,900
[music]

116
00:18:31,000 --> 00:21:50,780
[music: Bloom/Mercer, "Fools Rush In" (Nice ’n’ Easy); Frank Sinatra]

117
00:21:51,560 --> 00:21:54,440
Fools, as you may have gathered, rush in.

118
00:21:55,240 --> 00:22:01,720
First we heard one of the piano stylings of piano stylist Mr. S., currently in residence

119
00:22:01,720 --> 00:22:07,200
at the, well he's a cocktail pianist, and then Frank Sinatra, backed by the conductor

120
00:22:07,200 --> 00:22:09,140
and arranger Nelson Riddle.

121
00:22:10,430 --> 00:22:15,430
What's the difference between a headline about gullible investors and a headline about the

122
00:22:15,430 --> 00:22:36,420
and a headline about the only person ever to take advantage of Joseph Stalin? Well, one says, fools rush in, and the other says, fools Russian. Yeah, I did. I made that up myself. There's a lot more where that came from, too. Here's my card. I'm Peter Schickele, and this show is Schickele Mix from PRI, Public Radio International.

123
00:22:37,860 --> 00:22:57,990
When Mr. Wrong is Mr. Right, Part 2. We're talking about admonitions that should be taken with a grain of salt when it comes to musical training. And here's a guy who is so put off by excessive precision in ensembles that he calls his composition slop.

124
00:22:58,800 --> 00:27:32,220
[music: Mingus, "Slop" (Mingus Dynasty); Charles Mingus]

125
00:27:33,920 --> 00:27:44,380
Charles Mingus. The tune is called Slop from the Mingus Dynasty album. The West Point marching band it ain't, but right on it is.

126
00:27:44,960 --> 00:27:48,400
Now, here's another example of creative sloppiness.

127
00:27:48,740 --> 00:27:52,640
This is a chart I did for a Joan Baez album called Baptism.

128
00:27:53,420 --> 00:27:57,140
She's reading a cool but compassionate poem about blood.

129
00:27:57,600 --> 00:28:03,200
And to go with it, I wrote a slow-moving, unaccompanied melody that is played in unison

130
00:28:03,200 --> 00:28:06,780
but eventually over five octaves by a string orchestra.

131
00:28:06,780 --> 00:28:34,300
At a certain point I stopped conducting, and I had told the players that when I did that, they should gradually get out of sync. Some started playing a bit faster and some a bit slower, and they kept playing on their own, disregarding everybody else, until I cut them off at the end. It's an effect that would have been virtually impossible, and certainly unnecessarily complicated, to achieve with precise notation.

132
00:28:36,000 --> 00:28:40,300
[music: Schickele, "Song In the Blood" (Baptism); Joan Baez]

133
00:28:40,380 --> 00:28:46,620
[Joan Baez, recorded:] There are great puddles of blood on the world. Where's it all going, all this spilled blood?

134
00:28:47,880 --> 00:28:57,040
[Joan Baez, recorded:] Is it the earth that drinks it and gets drunk? Funny kind of drunkography, then, so wise, so monotonous.

135
00:28:57,980 --> 00:29:06,900
[Joan Baez, recorded:] No, the earth doesn't get drunk. The earth doesn't turn askew. It pushes its little car regularly, its four seasons:

136
00:29:06,900 --> 00:29:12,520
[Joan Baez, recorded:] rain, snow, hail, fair weather.

137
00:29:13,740 --> 00:29:21,220
[Joan Baez, recorded:] Never is it drunk. It's with difficulty it permits itself from time to time an unhappy little volcano.

138
00:29:22,120 --> 00:29:32,660
[Joan Baez, recorded:] It turns, the earth. It turns with its trees, its gardens, its houses. It turns with its great pools of blood,

139
00:29:32,660 --> 00:29:47,160
[Joan Baez, recorded:] and all living things turn with it and bleed. It doesn't give a damn, the earth. It turns, and all living things set up a howl. It doesn't give a damn.

140
00:29:47,160 --> 00:30:01,580
[Joan Baez, recorded:] It turns. It doesn't stop turning. And the blood doesn't stop running. Where's it going, all this spilled blood? Murder's blood, war's blood, misery's blood,

141
00:30:01,580 --> 00:30:14,760
[Joan Baez, recorded:] and the blood of men tortured in prisons, and the blood of children calmly tortured by their papa and their mom, and the blood of men whose heads bleed in padded cells,

142
00:30:14,760 --> 00:30:28,260
[Joan Baez, recorded:] and the roofer's blood when the roofer slips and falls from the roof, and the blood that comes and flows in great gushes with the newborn, with the new baby. The mother cries, the baby cries,

143
00:30:29,160 --> 00:30:43,720
[Joan Baez, recorded:] the blood flows, the earth turns, the earth doesn't stop turning, the blood doesn't stop flowing. Where's it going, all this spilled blood? Blood of the blackjacked, of the humiliated,

144
00:30:43,720 --> 00:30:52,300
[Joan Baez, recorded:] the blood of the wounded, of suicides, of firing squad victims, of the condemned, and the blood of those that die just

145
00:30:52,300 --> 00:31:07,940
[Joan Baez, recorded:] like that, by accident. In the street a living being goes by with all his blood inside. Suddenly there he is, dead, and all his blood outside. And other living beings make the blood disappear. They carry

146
00:31:07,940 --> 00:31:24,260
[Joan Baez, recorded:] the body away, but it's stubborn, the blood, and there where the dead one was, much later, all black, a little blood still stretches. Coagulated blood, life's rust, body's rust, blood curdled like milk,

147
00:31:24,260 --> 00:31:42,360
[Joan Baez, recorded:] like milk when it turns, when it turns like the earth, like the earth that turns with its milk, with its cows, with its living, with its dead, the earth that turns with its trees, with its

148
00:31:42,360 --> 00:31:59,340
[Joan Baez, recorded:] living beings, its houses, the earth that turns with marriages, burials, shells, regiments, the earth that turns and turns and turns with its great streams of blood.

149
00:33:02,750 --> 00:33:10,590
Joan Baez, reading Song in the Blood by Jacques Prévert, translated by Lawrence Ferlinghetti,

150
00:33:10,590 --> 00:33:20,410
To music written by a composer whom I knew quite well almost three decades ago but haven't seen since, the 33-year-old Peter Schickele.

151
00:33:21,750 --> 00:33:32,970
Okay, let's leave the subject of ensemble and look at wrong notes, or rather listen to them, or rather listen to some right notes that could be looked at or listened to as wrong.

152
00:33:33,650 --> 00:33:40,190
Now, not only do copyists make mistakes, but so do composers, and you have to correct those mistakes when you find them.

153
00:33:40,190 --> 00:33:46,410
I'm a lousy proofreader myself, and even my published music has its share of boo-boos,

154
00:33:46,450 --> 00:33:51,790
so-called because there are ghosts who sneak in and change the notes from what you wanted.

155
00:33:52,350 --> 00:33:57,910
But history is full of examples of composers writing pieces that caused some listeners

156
00:33:57,910 --> 00:34:00,330
to say, this can't be what you meant.

157
00:34:00,950 --> 00:34:04,950
Here's the beginning of Mozart's String Quartet in C, K465.

158
00:34:05,170 --> 00:34:21,290
This passage may not sound unsettling to ears that have heard Mahler and Monk and Messiaen, but it was so far out in 1785 that when the quartet was published, some purchasers sent the parts back, saying that there were too many mistakes in them.

159
00:34:22,320 --> 00:35:42,700
[music excerpt: Mozart, String Quartet in C (K 465), “Dissonance”; Emerson String Quartet]

160
00:35:42,700 --> 00:35:49,100
The Emerson Quartet, with the beginning of Mozart's C major quartet, Köchel No. 465.

161
00:35:49,620 --> 00:35:54,900
Because of that opening, the quartet has acquired the nickname Dissonant or Dissonances.

162
00:35:55,160 --> 00:35:56,340
These nicknames.

163
00:35:56,820 --> 00:36:02,240
I don't know why the next one Mozart wrote isn't called String Quartet No. 20 in D major,

164
00:36:02,320 --> 00:36:03,920
the Perfectly Fine Sounding.

165
00:36:04,940 --> 00:36:08,160
Here's another famous example of Mr. Wrong being Mr. Right.

166
00:36:08,280 --> 00:36:11,700
Beethoven's Third Symphony begins like this.

167
00:36:12,620 --> 00:36:35,580
[music excerpt: Beethoven, Symphony No. 3 in E-flat, Opus 55; London Classical Players/Norrington]

168
00:36:35,580 --> 00:36:42,680
Just before the recapitulation, as the violins play trembling, unresolved notes, there's

169
00:36:42,680 --> 00:36:47,500
a French horn anticipation, a sort of a pre-shadow of that main theme.

170
00:36:48,000 --> 00:36:53,660
But what makes it really unusual is that the notes in the theme spell out a chord that's

171
00:36:53,660 --> 00:36:59,140
different from the incomplete chord the violins are playing, so that in a sense you've got

172
00:36:59,140 --> 00:37:02,560
two different chords going on simultaneously.

173
00:37:04,100 --> 00:37:29,600
[music excerpt: Beethoven, Symphony No. 3 in E-flat, Opus 55, first movement, horn entrance before the recapitulation; London Classical Players/Norrington]

174
00:37:29,680 --> 00:37:56,040
Now, one of the critics after the first performance of the Eroica Symphony by Beethoven wrote that the first movement had been marred by the horn coming in early. And it's easy to see why. In fact, it's a perfectly reasonable assumption. Two bars later and the horn would have been right there in unison with the cellos. But it's great the way Beethoven wrote it, oddly enough. Well, here's an example of a right note that's supposed to sound wrong.

175
00:37:56,580 --> 00:38:00,860
Most of us know the sound of string players playing their open strings when they're tuning

176
00:38:00,860 --> 00:38:01,160
up.

177
00:38:01,540 --> 00:38:07,060
So when Saint-Saëns asks a violin soloist to tune the top string a half step lower

178
00:38:07,060 --> 00:38:12,400
than usual, he does it because he wants it to sound wrong, in the sense of macabre.

179
00:38:12,700 --> 00:38:18,420
In fact, the interval produced between the two top strings, called a tritone, used to

180
00:38:18,420 --> 00:38:20,140
be known as the Devil's Interval.

181
00:38:20,840 --> 00:38:28,540
We'll start with a little hoedown music, so you can get the sound of the usual string tuning in your ears, and then we'll move on to the macabre.

182
00:38:29,380 --> 00:38:54,900
[music excerpt: Hayman, "Pops Hoedown" (Round-Up); Cincinnati Pops Orchestra/Kunzel]

183
00:38:57,000 --> 00:40:24,120
[music excerpt: Saint-Saëns, "Danse Macabre"; Philadelphia Orchestra/Ormandy]

184
00:40:24,260 --> 00:40:34,520
Shiver me timbers. First we heard the opening of Richard Hayman's Pops Hoedown, played by Kunzel in the Cincinnati Pops, and then part of the Danse Macabre by Saint-Saëns.

185
00:40:35,280 --> 00:40:40,640
That was Ormandy in the Philadelphia, but it doesn't give the name of the violinist.

186
00:40:41,220 --> 00:40:43,500
Maybe it's because he or she wasn't gay.

187
00:40:43,900 --> 00:40:48,540
See, the record store in my neighborhood doesn't have much in the way of classical music, and

188
00:40:48,540 --> 00:40:53,320
the only recording of the danse macabre I could find was in an album called Out Classics

189
00:40:53,320 --> 00:40:59,820
II, music by composers who were gay or are assumed by the compilers of the album to have

190
00:40:59,820 --> 00:41:04,360
been gay because there's no evidence to the contrary, which is apparently the case with

191
00:41:04,440 --> 00:41:34,260
Corelli. Whatever these albums do for the cause of gay pride, they are widely recognized as triumphs of packaging. And during these straitened times in the classical record industry, I think we can look forward to albums like In Classics, music written by composers with concave belly buttons, and Puff Classics, music written by smokers, and Yokel Classics, music written by American composers who did not study with Nadia Boulanger

192
00:41:34,260 --> 00:41:52,440
in Paris. I'd like to see an album called P.J. Classics, music by composers in their 60s who still eat peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. Because probably the only composer on the album would be Peter Schickele, the host of Schickele Mix, from P.R.I., Public Radio International.

193
00:41:55,010 --> 00:42:00,370
Ok, now it's time to play our quiz game, when Mr. Wrong is Mr. Right.

194
00:42:01,010 --> 00:42:04,270
And, uh, I think we've got a contestant on the line here, hello?

195
00:42:04,770 --> 00:42:05,870
Hi, what's your name?

196
00:42:06,550 --> 00:42:08,410
Ok, Jalinda, here's the deal.

197
00:42:08,830 --> 00:42:15,750
I'm gonna play a chord, a single chord, and it may sound wrong to you, but it's exactly what the composer wrote.

198
00:42:16,030 --> 00:42:22,600
Now all you have to do, for $1500, is guess what year the chord was written in.

199
00:42:22,700 --> 00:42:25,460
Okay, you ready? Here goes.

200
00:42:26,700 --> 00:42:33,390
[music excerpt: Rebel, "Les Elémens," opening chord; Musica Antiqua Köln/Goebel]

201
00:42:33,390 --> 00:42:36,230
So, Jalinda, what year do you think that chord was written in?

202
00:42:37,560 --> 00:42:39,500
Oh, I'm sorry, Jalinda.

203
00:42:39,600 --> 00:42:44,420
The correct answer, and it's a very surprising one, is 1737.

204
00:42:46,440 --> 00:42:52,080
That's...well, we do allow a bit of leeway, Jalinda, but 37 BC is really quite far off,

205
00:42:52,160 --> 00:42:52,780
I think you'll agree.

206
00:42:53,000 --> 00:42:54,440
So better luck next time.

207
00:42:54,440 --> 00:43:22,820
And meanwhile, we'll be sending you your consolation prize, which is a CD of, uh, well, the subtitle is Three Centuries of Neglected Keyboard Masterpieces by Lully, Schobert, and Alkan, but the album is called Ouch Classics, music by composers who died from stabbing themselves in the foot with their own baton, or from eating poisonous mushrooms at a picnic, or from having a bookcase fall over on them. Thanks for being with us, Jalinda.

208
00:43:22,820 --> 00:43:26,220
Okay, so what did you guess on that chord?

209
00:43:26,600 --> 00:43:32,820
The thing that makes 1737 such an unlikely answer is that the chord is really sort of

210
00:43:32,820 --> 00:43:33,580
a tone cluster.

211
00:43:33,800 --> 00:43:37,360
It has all seven notes of the D minor scale in it.

212
00:43:37,520 --> 00:43:41,260
And tone clusters weren't really developed until the 20th century.

213
00:43:41,700 --> 00:43:49,760
But in 1737, a French composer named Jean-Féry Rebel wrote a piece called The Elements, and

214
00:43:49,780 --> 00:43:54,360
that chord is the beginning of the remarkable first section, which represents chaos.

215
00:43:55,080 --> 00:43:57,940
Let me play it again. I'll let it go on a bit longer this time.

216
00:43:59,040 --> 00:44:27,230
[music excerpt: Rebel, "Les Elémens," opening (again); Musica Antiqua Köln/Goebel]

217
00:44:27,230 --> 00:44:32,490
Okay, once it starts going in unison and you hear the harpsichord there, then it sounds 18th century.

218
00:44:32,630 --> 00:44:35,530
But before that, it sounds like movie music, doesn't it?

219
00:44:35,910 --> 00:44:41,210
In fact, it makes me want to present one of our exclusive Schickele Mix radio dramas.

220
00:44:42,050 --> 00:44:51,860
Now, I never went to sleepaway camp myself, but my friend Bob Lewis did, and he once told me one of the scary campfire stories he remembered from his youth.

221
00:44:52,200 --> 00:44:58,200
So here, with music from Rebel's The Elements, is the world premiere of

222
00:44:58,300 --> 00:45:04,100
[music excerpt: Rebel, "Les Elémens"; Musica Antiqua Köln/Goebel]

223
00:45:04,160 --> 00:45:06,740
The Secret of Morley Mansion.

224
00:45:13,120 --> 00:45:19,020
Trent Cartwell, dashing young man about town, has decided to become a dashing young man

225
00:45:19,020 --> 00:45:19,740
about country.

226
00:45:20,040 --> 00:45:28,280
For the first time since he purchased it from Silas Morley's estate, he is visiting the crumbling 200-year-old mansion

227
00:45:28,280 --> 00:45:31,940
that rises above the mists of Parkway Fen.

228
00:45:33,540 --> 00:45:52,120
I don't know. Maybe I shouldn't have bought this place after all. Everybody says it's haunted. Something about a guy who can turn himself into a snake. I mean, not that I believe in that stuff. What's that? That door's opening. It must just be a draft. No!

229
00:45:53,400 --> 00:45:55,100
There's someone behind it!

230
00:46:00,210 --> 00:46:02,200
I am the Viper!

231
00:46:15,280 --> 00:46:17,700
No! Stay where you are! Who are you?

232
00:46:18,000 --> 00:46:19,800
I am the Viper!

233
00:46:20,020 --> 00:46:21,160
What do you want from me?

234
00:46:21,360 --> 00:46:23,960
No! Don't take another step! I own this house!

235
00:46:24,520 --> 00:46:25,800
Why are you here?

236
00:46:31,160 --> 00:46:33,060
I am the Viper!

237
00:46:35,160 --> 00:46:37,500
You want your windows viped?

238
00:46:50,440 --> 00:46:57,940
And that was Reinhard Goebel and the Musica Antiqua Köln performing excerpts from Rebel's The Elements.

239
00:46:57,940 --> 00:47:01,440
When Wrong Notes Happen to Right People, whatever that means.

240
00:47:01,440 --> 00:47:10,040
Back around 1960, when I used to subscribe to Downbeat magazine, there were always letter-to-the-editor

241
00:47:10,040 --> 00:47:15,960
fights about the Downbeat jazz poll, especially in the piano category. When Thelonious Monk

242
00:47:15,960 --> 00:47:20,900
won, somebody would write in saying, it's about time a pianist won who's not just a

243
00:47:20,900 --> 00:47:27,500
technician. And when Oscar Peterson won, somebody would say, finally, the prize goes to someone who can

244
00:47:27,600 --> 00:47:35,200
actually play piano. It's lucky for the less partisan among us that one doesn't have to choose between those two giants.

245
00:47:35,370 --> 00:47:44,270
It's true that Peterson's fingers seem virtually incapable of playing a clunker, whereas Monk's playing is full of clunkers.

246
00:47:44,410 --> 00:47:48,730
That is, it's full of notes that would be clunkers in anybody else's playing.

247
00:47:49,230 --> 00:47:55,110
But Monk built his whole style around right and wrong notes, by which I mean nice notes

248
00:47:55,110 --> 00:47:56,190
and not-so-nice notes.

249
00:47:56,190 --> 00:48:00,910
He reminds me of the British painter Francis Bacon, who said something like,

250
00:48:00,970 --> 00:48:03,350
A mistake is your unconscious speaking.

251
00:48:04,130 --> 00:48:13,310
Monk's style was often an unlikely fusion of smooth, old-fashioned stride piano in the left hand and spiky bebop in the right.

252
00:48:14,260 --> 00:48:17,800
But you can feel him straining against the limits of his technique.

253
00:48:18,500 --> 00:48:22,820
Peterson, on the other hand, seems to be able to do just about anything he wants.

254
00:48:22,820 --> 00:48:26,140
Here's the two of them in no particular order.

255
00:48:26,140 --> 00:51:54,800
[music: Waller/Razaf, "Honeysuckle Rose" (Live at the Blue Note); Oscar Peterson Trio]

256
00:51:58,640 --> 00:54:25,260
[music: Lewis/Young/Akst, "Dinah" (Solo Monk); Thelonious Monk]

257
00:54:25,830 --> 00:54:32,030
Oscar Peterson with Honeysuckle Rose and Thelonious Monk playing Dinah.

258
00:54:33,050 --> 00:54:34,890
Like I said, if the-

259
00:54:34,890 --> 00:54:36,780
[sound: phone rings] Sorry about this.

260
00:54:37,300 --> 00:54:37,940
Hello?

261
00:54:38,720 --> 00:54:40,960
Hey Laurie, I'm glad you called.

262
00:54:41,280 --> 00:54:44,540
So how are things going with this guy you met, this violist?

263
00:54:45,800 --> 00:54:47,240
Oh, that's terrific.

264
00:54:48,360 --> 00:54:49,280
Oh yeah?

265
00:54:49,280 --> 00:54:54,260
So he's loosening you up a bit as a musician, huh?

266
00:54:56,040 --> 00:55:02,320
Oh, well, I guess that would do it, playing a Bach partita on the piano while you're sitting on his lap.

267
00:55:02,900 --> 00:55:10,460
I mean, the angle of your arms to the keyboard is different, and I guess it's a little bit harder to reach the sustaining pedal, which is probably for the...

268
00:55:10,810 --> 00:55:19,010
Oh, I see. He does the pedaling. Okay. Sort of like a piano built for two, right? Great.

269
00:55:19,010 --> 00:55:23,890
Hey, Laurie, I gotta wrap things up here, but give me a call. You're never home, you know.

270
00:55:24,950 --> 00:55:28,470
Yeah, that's what I figured. Okay, I will. Take care.

271
00:55:29,030 --> 00:55:34,030
And take good care of that friend of yours, too. Because you know what happens when a violist dies.

272
00:55:34,850 --> 00:55:37,970
They move him back a stand. Okay, bye.

273
00:55:39,780 --> 00:56:03,800
[music: Lewis/Young/Akst, "Dinah" (Solo Monk); Thelonious Monk (again)]

274
00:56:04,080 --> 00:56:06,020
And that's Schickele Mix for this week.

275
00:56:06,360 --> 00:56:12,700
Our program is made possible with funds provided by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and by the National Endowment for the Arts,

276
00:56:12,700 --> 00:56:16,560
with additional support from the National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences

277
00:56:16,560 --> 00:56:19,180
and from this radio station and its members.

278
00:56:19,720 --> 00:56:23,900
Not only that, our program is distributed by PRI, Public Radio International.

279
00:56:24,380 --> 00:56:26,960
And thanks for your help, Stephanie Wendt.

280
00:56:27,040 --> 00:56:31,500
We'll tell you in a moment how you can get an official playlist of all the music on today's program

281
00:56:31,500 --> 00:56:32,900
with album numbers and everything.

282
00:56:33,100 --> 00:56:34,820
Just refer to the program number.

283
00:56:34,980 --> 00:56:37,660
This is program number 145.

284
00:56:38,260 --> 00:56:44,840
And this is Peter Schickele saying goodbye and reminding you that it don't mean a thing if it ain't got that certain je ne sais quoi.

285
00:56:45,180 --> 00:56:47,380
You're looking good. See you next week.

286
00:56:47,880 --> 00:58:07,260
[music: Lewis/Young/Akst, "Dinah" (Solo Monk); Thelonious Monk (again)]

287
00:58:09,130 --> 00:58:14,630
If you'd like a copy of that playlist I mentioned, send a stamped self-addressed envelope to Schickele Mix.

288
00:58:15,210 --> 00:58:19,530
That's S-C-H-I-C-K-E-L-E, Schickele Mix.

289
00:58:19,530 --> 00:58:27,610
Care of Public Radio International, 100 North 6th Street, Suite 900A, Minneapolis, MN 55403.

290
00:58:29,430 --> 00:58:34,060
[announcer:] PRI, Public Radio International.