1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:04,000
Shickly Mix is next. Are you ready, Peter?

2
00:00:04,000 --> 00:00:08,000
Hey, I'm supposed to be ready. I'm ready. Here's the theme.

3
00:00:22,000 --> 00:00:26,000
Hello there. I'm Peter Shickly and this is Shickly Mix,

4
00:00:26,000 --> 00:00:30,000
a program dedicated to the proposition that all musics are created equal.

5
00:00:30,000 --> 00:00:34,000
Or, as Duke Ellington put it, if it sounds good,

6
00:00:34,000 --> 00:00:38,000
it is good. As a rule, our bills are paid

7
00:00:38,000 --> 00:00:42,000
by this terrific radio station where I'm provided with this small,

8
00:00:42,000 --> 00:00:46,000
yet modest studio space. As a rule, our program

9
00:00:46,000 --> 00:00:50,000
is distributed to the four corners by PRI, Public Radio International.

10
00:00:50,000 --> 00:00:54,000
And, as a rule, there were certain

11
00:00:54,000 --> 00:00:58,000
things that classical European composers just wouldn't

12
00:00:58,000 --> 00:01:02,000
do. I mean, they weren't that kind of girl and

13
00:01:02,000 --> 00:01:06,000
don't you forget it, Buster. And one of the things they

14
00:01:06,000 --> 00:01:10,000
wouldn't do, even if they had fallen on hard times,

15
00:01:10,000 --> 00:01:14,000
was to write parallel fifths. Parallel fifths occur

16
00:01:14,000 --> 00:01:18,000
when two parts are at the interval of a fifth from each other.

17
00:01:18,000 --> 00:01:22,000
One, two, three, four, five. That's a fifth.

18
00:01:22,000 --> 00:01:26,000
And then they both move the same distance in the same direction.

19
00:01:26,000 --> 00:01:30,000
Here they both move up one step,

20
00:01:30,000 --> 00:01:34,000
resulting in consecutive or parallel fifths.

21
00:01:38,000 --> 00:01:42,000
Now, when you play them alone like that,

22
00:01:42,000 --> 00:01:46,000
they have a hollow sound that we Westerners tend to associate with Chinese music.

23
00:01:46,000 --> 00:01:50,000
But, even if the other parts in the texture

24
00:01:50,000 --> 00:01:54,000
disguise that hollowness,

25
00:01:54,000 --> 00:01:58,000
even then, it was a definite

26
00:01:58,000 --> 00:02:02,000
no-no to write parallel fifths among your law-abiding

27
00:02:02,000 --> 00:02:06,000
late Renaissance Baroque classical and early romantic composers.

28
00:02:06,000 --> 00:02:10,000
I mean, European composers went out of their way

29
00:02:10,000 --> 00:02:14,000
to avoid writing parallel fifths for about 400

30
00:02:14,000 --> 00:02:18,000
years. Say, 1500 to 1900, something

31
00:02:18,000 --> 00:02:22,000
like that. Now, that's a pretty powerful taboo.

32
00:02:22,000 --> 00:02:26,000
I've mentioned on other shows that musical rules are descriptive, not

33
00:02:26,000 --> 00:02:30,000
proscriptive. That is, they simply describe what composers

34
00:02:30,000 --> 00:02:34,000
of a given period happened to do. But there are some rules

35
00:02:34,000 --> 00:02:38,000
that were thought of as rules at the time, and that were almost always

36
00:02:38,000 --> 00:02:42,000
observed by even the most adventuresome composers.

37
00:02:42,000 --> 00:02:46,000
Here's a nice anecdote about Beethoven, and I am quoting it verbatim.

38
00:02:46,000 --> 00:02:50,000
You know, the romantic picture of Beethoven makes him

39
00:02:50,000 --> 00:02:54,000
out to be so monumental and Zeus-like. You think

40
00:02:54,000 --> 00:02:58,000
of him as sort of a mobile Mount Everest. You never think

41
00:02:58,000 --> 00:03:02,000
of him simply taking a walk with a friend. This is from the

42
00:03:02,000 --> 00:03:06,000
memoirs of Ferdinand Ries, a sophisticated musician

43
00:03:06,000 --> 00:03:10,000
who knew Beethoven well.

44
00:03:10,000 --> 00:03:14,000
Once, while out walking with him, I mentioned two perfect

45
00:03:14,000 --> 00:03:18,000
fifths, which stand out by their beauty of sound in

46
00:03:18,000 --> 00:03:22,000
one of his earlier violin quartets in C minor.

47
00:03:22,000 --> 00:03:26,000
Beethoven did not know of them, and insisted it was wrong to call them

48
00:03:26,000 --> 00:03:30,000
fifths. Since he was in the habit of always carrying music

49
00:03:30,000 --> 00:03:34,000
paper about him, I asked for some, and sent down the passage

50
00:03:34,000 --> 00:03:38,000
in all four parts. Then, when he saw I was right,

51
00:03:38,000 --> 00:03:42,000
he said, Well, and who

52
00:03:42,000 --> 00:03:46,000
has forbidden them? Since I did not

53
00:03:46,000 --> 00:03:50,000
know how to take his question, he repeated it several times

54
00:03:50,000 --> 00:03:54,000
until, much astonished, I replied,

55
00:03:54,000 --> 00:03:58,000
It is one of the fundamental rules. Again, he

56
00:03:58,000 --> 00:04:02,000
repeated his question, whereupon I said, Marburg,

57
00:04:02,000 --> 00:04:06,000
Kernberger, Fuchs, etc., etc., all the theoreticians.

58
00:04:06,000 --> 00:04:10,000
And so I allow them,

59
00:04:10,000 --> 00:04:14,000
was his answer. Now, the significance of that

60
00:04:14,000 --> 00:04:18,000
story is not only that old Ludwig obviously had a lot

61
00:04:18,000 --> 00:04:22,000
of attitude when it came to authority, but also

62
00:04:22,000 --> 00:04:26,000
that the rule against parallel fifths was so regularly

63
00:04:26,000 --> 00:04:30,000
observed that on the rare occasions it was flaunted,

64
00:04:30,000 --> 00:04:34,000
the flaunting was noticed and remarked upon.

65
00:04:34,000 --> 00:04:38,000
Now, speaking of flaunting, I got curious about that word,

66
00:04:38,000 --> 00:04:42,000
and I looked it up, and it says,

67
00:04:42,000 --> 00:04:46,000
I'm not going to read the meanings, but in usage it says,

68
00:04:46,000 --> 00:04:50,000
Although transitive sense to a flaunt undoubtedly arose

69
00:04:50,000 --> 00:04:54,000
from confusion with flout,

70
00:04:54,000 --> 00:04:58,000
so I looked up that flout,

71
00:04:58,000 --> 00:05:02,000
and it says, Probably

72
00:05:02,000 --> 00:05:06,000
from Middle English flouten, to play the flute.

73
00:05:06,000 --> 00:05:10,000
I mean, how about that? What does

74
00:05:10,000 --> 00:05:14,000
treating with contentious disregard have to do with playing

75
00:05:14,000 --> 00:05:18,000
the flute? Well, now you know what flautists

76
00:05:18,000 --> 00:05:22,000
really are. You know, the old musicians saying, what's the difference between

77
00:05:22,000 --> 00:05:26,000
a flutist and a flautist? A flautist earns more money. Anyway,

78
00:05:26,000 --> 00:05:30,000
I hope that henceforth you will treat flautists accordingly.

79
00:05:30,000 --> 00:05:34,000
Speaking of flutes and of rules, I read a good story somewhere

80
00:05:34,000 --> 00:05:38,000
about Quants, who was a composer and a flutist, who worked for King Frederick

81
00:05:38,000 --> 00:05:42,000
the Great, who also was a composer and a flutist. Quants was

82
00:05:42,000 --> 00:05:46,000
his teacher. So, one evening they're playing through a new piece by King Fred,

83
00:05:46,000 --> 00:05:50,000
and at one point there's an infelicitous passage.

84
00:05:50,000 --> 00:05:54,000
The king had committed a compositional gaffe. Maybe it

85
00:05:54,000 --> 00:05:58,000
was parallel fifths. And Quants, he just coughed.

86
00:05:58,000 --> 00:06:02,000
He wasn't about to criticize the king in front of other people. He just

87
00:06:02,000 --> 00:06:06,000
coughed, and the king later went back and revised that spot.

88
00:06:06,000 --> 00:06:10,000
Maybe it wasn't parallel fifths. Maybe the

89
00:06:10,000 --> 00:06:14,000
royal boo-boo was parallel octaves, equally

90
00:06:14,000 --> 00:06:18,000
frowned upon, which is actually perhaps easier to understand than

91
00:06:18,000 --> 00:06:22,000
the outlawing of parallel fifths. Basically, it's the same deal.

92
00:06:22,000 --> 00:06:26,000
Parallel octaves occur when two voices, and I mean

93
00:06:26,000 --> 00:06:30,000
voices here as independent parts in the texture, not necessarily singers,

94
00:06:30,000 --> 00:06:34,000
two voices are an octave apart,

95
00:06:38,000 --> 00:06:42,000
and they move the same distance in the same direction,

96
00:06:44,000 --> 00:06:48,000
creating consecutive octaves.

97
00:06:52,000 --> 00:06:56,000
Now, the rationale in this case is quite clear.

98
00:06:56,000 --> 00:07:00,000
Traditional harmony and counterpoint are often taught as separate

99
00:07:00,000 --> 00:07:04,000
disciplines, but they're really just different aspects of the same thing.

100
00:07:04,000 --> 00:07:08,000
Even in the quintessential example of harmonic writing,

101
00:07:08,000 --> 00:07:12,000
a Protestant church hymn, in which all four parts,

102
00:07:12,000 --> 00:07:16,000
soprano, alto, tenor, bass, have the same or virtually the same rhythm,

103
00:07:16,000 --> 00:07:20,000
melodically they're regarded as four independent melodies.

104
00:07:20,000 --> 00:07:24,000
Each part, if sung separately, should sound like a

105
00:07:24,000 --> 00:07:28,000
reasonable, not necessarily a fascinating, but a reasonable melody.

106
00:07:28,000 --> 00:07:32,000
And the craft lies in creating a beautiful

107
00:07:32,000 --> 00:07:36,000
succession of chords by combining four independent melodies.

108
00:07:36,000 --> 00:07:40,000
But, if two of the melodies are doing the same thing,

109
00:07:40,000 --> 00:07:44,000
the alto goes G-F,

110
00:07:44,000 --> 00:07:48,000
and the tenor goes G-F at the same time,

111
00:07:48,000 --> 00:07:52,000
then, for that moment, there are not two melodies, they're one melody,

112
00:07:52,000 --> 00:07:56,000
doubled up at the octave. In terms of counterpoint,

113
00:07:56,000 --> 00:08:00,000
you've gone from a four-part texture to a three-part texture.

114
00:08:00,000 --> 00:08:04,000
You've wasted an opportunity for contrapuntal interest, for melodic interplay.

115
00:08:04,000 --> 00:08:08,000
There's a Mozart piano sonata in B-flat

116
00:08:08,000 --> 00:08:12,000
that I've been playing since college days, and part of the first movement goes like this.

117
00:08:12,000 --> 00:08:27,000
...

118
00:08:27,000 --> 00:08:32,000
Okay, that's as much as we need, which is just as well, because that's where the fast notes come in.

119
00:08:32,000 --> 00:08:36,000
What we've got here is a three-part texture. We've got the melody,

120
00:08:36,000 --> 00:08:40,000
...

121
00:08:40,000 --> 00:08:44,000
and then we've got the bass line.

122
00:08:44,000 --> 00:08:48,000
Put those together.

123
00:08:48,000 --> 00:08:53,000
...

124
00:08:53,000 --> 00:08:57,000
And then, in the middle, you've got the do-ee, do-ee, do-ee part.

125
00:08:57,000 --> 00:09:03,000
...

126
00:09:03,000 --> 00:09:07,000
So, let me play all three of those together, and very slowly.

127
00:09:07,000 --> 00:09:23,000
...

128
00:09:23,000 --> 00:09:28,000
Hear that? Parallel octaves. Everything was independent until then, and all of a sudden,

129
00:09:28,000 --> 00:09:31,000
...

130
00:09:31,000 --> 00:09:34,000
I can't help it. This has bothered me for almost 50 years now.

131
00:09:34,000 --> 00:09:37,000
I mean, it bothered me then. It bothers me now.

132
00:09:37,000 --> 00:09:42,000
You know, I even looked up an authentic edition of Mozart's sonatas to make sure that's what he really wrote,

133
00:09:42,000 --> 00:09:46,000
but I guess he didn't care.

134
00:09:46,000 --> 00:09:52,000
Now, I certainly don't go poring over scores, looking for parallel octaves in the inner parts or anything,

135
00:09:52,000 --> 00:09:57,000
but when it's prominent and compromises the independence of the voices,

136
00:09:57,000 --> 00:10:00,000
I tend to notice it. Sorry, I can't help it.

137
00:10:00,000 --> 00:10:05,000
Like, I was listening to a CD that a friend gave me for Christmas.

138
00:10:05,000 --> 00:10:09,000
It's a nice little novelty album called A Toolbox Christmas.

139
00:10:09,000 --> 00:10:26,000
...

140
00:10:26,000 --> 00:10:32,000
Okay, now let me just play the outside voices, the melody and the bass line here.

141
00:10:32,000 --> 00:10:48,000
...

142
00:10:48,000 --> 00:10:53,000
Now, it's right here.

143
00:10:53,000 --> 00:10:59,000
Hear that? Hear that?

144
00:10:59,000 --> 00:11:03,000
You see, the bass line and the melody line are the same there.

145
00:11:03,000 --> 00:11:08,000
Up till there, it's been a beautiful counterpoint between the melody and the bass, very independent,

146
00:11:08,000 --> 00:11:11,000
but all of a sudden, they're in the same notes.

147
00:11:11,000 --> 00:11:30,000
Listen to it again, just in the original. See if you can spot that.

148
00:11:30,000 --> 00:11:36,000
You know, it's the lack of counterpoint, the lack of consistency in terms of independence.

149
00:11:36,000 --> 00:11:39,000
By the way, Toolbox Christmas, I know it sounds pretty weird.

150
00:11:39,000 --> 00:11:44,000
It is pretty weird, but it's a very tastefully done album, very clever arrangements.

151
00:11:44,000 --> 00:11:48,000
Now, I'm not complaining about parallel octaves when they're consistent,

152
00:11:48,000 --> 00:11:51,000
when they're not pretending to be two different parts.

153
00:11:51,000 --> 00:11:55,000
For instance, at the beginning of Mozart's 40th Symphony.

154
00:11:55,000 --> 00:12:24,000
...

155
00:12:24,000 --> 00:12:33,000
Okay, now in that opening, the first violins are playing the melody here.

156
00:12:33,000 --> 00:12:38,000
And the second violins are playing it here.

157
00:12:38,000 --> 00:12:44,000
So together, they sound...

158
00:12:44,000 --> 00:12:51,000
That's one melody, contrapuntally speaking, one part, in which octaves are used as an instrumental color.

159
00:12:51,000 --> 00:12:57,000
It got sort of overused in the 19th century, perhaps, but it's a beautiful color, violins and octaves.

160
00:12:57,000 --> 00:13:02,000
In 18th century orchestral music, the cellos and basses are almost always in octaves.

161
00:13:02,000 --> 00:13:06,000
That's not parallel octaves. That's just a different color for the melody.

162
00:13:06,000 --> 00:13:12,000
Then there's the sort of hybrid texture in between parallel and independent that I've always loved.

163
00:13:12,000 --> 00:13:17,000
You hear it in traditional Asian music a lot, but this piece is from medieval Europe.

164
00:13:17,000 --> 00:13:23,000
The basic melody is on the bottom, and the recorder is playing above it, following the tune,

165
00:13:23,000 --> 00:13:28,000
but adding all sorts of embellishment notes, so it's the same but different.

166
00:13:28,000 --> 00:13:31,000
But it's consistently the same but different.

167
00:13:31,000 --> 00:14:00,000
..

168
00:14:00,000 --> 00:14:07,000
.

169
00:14:07,000 --> 00:14:12,000
The Istanbul palamento. That's a medieval piece.

170
00:14:12,000 --> 00:14:16,000
Here's a beautiful romantic example of the same idea.

171
00:14:16,000 --> 00:14:22,000
About nine seconds into this excerpt, the violins start following the melody in the cellos below,

172
00:14:22,000 --> 00:14:25,000
but with a slightly different rhythm.

173
00:14:25,000 --> 00:14:30,000
It's sort of like water at the edge of a lake, lapping on the melody.

174
00:14:55,000 --> 00:15:09,000
.

175
00:15:09,000 --> 00:15:12,000
From the second movement of Brahms' Third Symphony.

176
00:15:12,000 --> 00:15:18,000
Now I should mention that the principle of avoiding parallel octaves in a contrapuntal texture,

177
00:15:18,000 --> 00:15:24,000
where the parts are otherwise independent, is not a principle that has always been with us.

178
00:15:24,000 --> 00:15:31,000
This is a lovely motet by Adam de la Hall, a trouvert who lived in the second half of the 13th century.

179
00:15:54,000 --> 00:16:23,000
.

180
00:16:23,000 --> 00:16:52,000
.

181
00:16:52,000 --> 00:17:18,000
.

182
00:17:18,000 --> 00:17:23,000
The early music concert of London under the direction of David Monroe,

183
00:17:23,000 --> 00:17:28,000
performing Adam de la Hall's J'a bien à mame parler.

184
00:17:28,000 --> 00:17:31,000
So the piece begins like this.

185
00:17:31,000 --> 00:17:35,000
.

186
00:17:35,000 --> 00:17:37,000
And there they are, right there, parallel octaves.

187
00:17:37,000 --> 00:17:44,000
.

188
00:17:44,000 --> 00:17:49,000
That's funny. Those are exactly the same pitches as the Toolbox Christmas.

189
00:17:49,000 --> 00:17:56,000
I want a sales song. How about that?

190
00:17:56,000 --> 00:17:58,000
Ah, it stopped fooling around.

191
00:17:58,000 --> 00:18:04,000
Now, Adam de la Hall, when it came to parallel octaves, he really didn't care.

192
00:18:04,000 --> 00:18:10,000
Now, you could argue that de la Hall's voices are more independent than Bach's,

193
00:18:10,000 --> 00:18:14,000
because they're free to create parallel octaves or not.

194
00:18:14,000 --> 00:18:17,000
Voice B is not prevented from going to a certain note,

195
00:18:17,000 --> 00:18:21,000
just because it would cause parallel octaves with voice A.

196
00:18:21,000 --> 00:18:24,000
But hey, we're getting very philosophical here.

197
00:18:24,000 --> 00:18:31,000
You know, true independence would mean writing parts without any regard to each other whatsoever,

198
00:18:31,000 --> 00:18:35,000
and then just throwing them together and seeing how they sound,

199
00:18:35,000 --> 00:18:40,000
or hearing how they look, or smelling how they feel, whatever.

200
00:18:40,000 --> 00:18:44,000
Whatever you can think of, it was probably done in the 20th century,

201
00:18:44,000 --> 00:18:49,000
the century in which chance took a stance and pulled down all our pants.

202
00:18:49,000 --> 00:18:54,000
But I must say, I'm a child of my training when it comes to parallel octaves.

203
00:18:54,000 --> 00:19:01,000
In the context of independent parts, I don't like to commit, as it were, parallel octaves at random.

204
00:19:01,000 --> 00:19:05,000
Which brings me to a true and painful confession.

205
00:19:05,000 --> 00:19:34,000
Here's a piece I wrote in college as an exercise in Handalian style.

206
00:19:34,000 --> 00:19:46,000
Here's a piece I wrote in college as an exercise in Handalian style.

207
00:19:46,000 --> 00:20:10,000
Here's a piece I wrote in college as an exercise in Handalian style.

208
00:20:10,000 --> 00:20:34,000
Here's a piece I wrote in college as an exercise in Handalian style.

209
00:20:34,000 --> 00:20:58,000
Here's a piece I wrote in college as an exercise in Handalian style.

210
00:20:58,000 --> 00:21:12,000
Now, I'm not in the habit of publishing my school exercises,

211
00:21:12,000 --> 00:21:18,000
but more than 40 years after I wrote it, I still have a soft spot in my heart for that one,

212
00:21:18,000 --> 00:21:22,000
and a bunch of people have used it in their wedding ceremonies,

213
00:21:22,000 --> 00:21:25,000
and some of those marriages have even remained intact.

214
00:21:25,000 --> 00:21:30,000
So I finally had it published recently, simply titled Ceremonial March,

215
00:21:30,000 --> 00:21:35,000
and I hope it continues to contribute to happy occasions over the years.

216
00:21:35,000 --> 00:21:40,000
But there is a deep, dark secret attached to the piece.

217
00:21:40,000 --> 00:21:56,000
In the third measure here, let me play it without the middle voice.

218
00:21:56,000 --> 00:22:00,000
Parallel octaves, parallel octaves!

219
00:22:00,000 --> 00:22:04,000
Now, I don't know if I noticed that when I wrote the piece or soon thereafter,

220
00:22:04,000 --> 00:22:09,000
but it's been nagging at me on and off for lo these many years.

221
00:22:09,000 --> 00:22:13,000
When I prepared the piece for publication, I even tried to think of a way to change it,

222
00:22:13,000 --> 00:22:17,000
but I couldn't come up with anything that didn't call attention to itself,

223
00:22:17,000 --> 00:22:20,000
that didn't disturb the serenity of the passage,

224
00:22:20,000 --> 00:22:23,000
and I sort of feel like it does have a certain serenity.

225
00:22:23,000 --> 00:22:25,000
So I let it stand.

226
00:22:25,000 --> 00:22:29,000
As a composer, I like the heart and the head to agree on things,

227
00:22:29,000 --> 00:22:32,000
but when they don't, the head loses out.

228
00:22:32,000 --> 00:22:36,000
What the hay? Mozart wrote parallel octaves, and he was Mozart.

229
00:22:36,000 --> 00:22:45,000
I'm just Peter Shickley, the host of Shickley Mix from PRI, Public Radio International.

230
00:22:45,000 --> 00:22:49,000
Today's show is called Playing by the Rules.

231
00:22:49,000 --> 00:22:53,000
Now, when I said at the top of the show that the rule against parallel fifths

232
00:22:53,000 --> 00:22:57,000
was so regularly observed that when it wasn't, people noticed,

233
00:22:57,000 --> 00:23:00,000
I didn't mean that everybody noticed.

234
00:23:00,000 --> 00:23:05,000
I'm not saying that your average Yosef blow sitting on a stool in the corner bar,

235
00:23:05,000 --> 00:23:08,000
I'm not saying he noticed.

236
00:23:08,000 --> 00:23:11,000
And yourself, what do you got to say for yourself?

237
00:23:11,000 --> 00:23:23,000
Have you ever noticed the parallel fifths in Beethoven's C minor quartet?

238
00:23:23,000 --> 00:23:25,000
I have.

239
00:23:25,000 --> 00:23:29,000
Okay, yourself, that's it for you tonight.

240
00:23:29,000 --> 00:23:33,000
No, what I'm saying is that connoisseurs noticed.

241
00:23:33,000 --> 00:23:38,000
Most people couldn't care less, except that good composers sound better than bad composers,

242
00:23:38,000 --> 00:23:40,000
even if you don't know why.

243
00:23:40,000 --> 00:23:43,000
Well, how about you? Are you a connoisseur?

244
00:23:43,000 --> 00:23:49,000
Here's your chance to find out as we present another Shickley Mix special.

245
00:23:49,000 --> 00:23:57,000
Thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you for joining us here in Studio P

246
00:23:57,000 --> 00:24:03,000
as we get ready to play, well, excuse me,

247
00:24:03,000 --> 00:24:07,000
the game of the rules and those who break them.

248
00:24:07,000 --> 00:24:10,000
It's our job to see that they get caught.

249
00:24:10,000 --> 00:24:13,000
Our show is sponsored by the Downtown Burbank,

250
00:24:13,000 --> 00:24:17,000
the bank that has what it takes to take what you have.

251
00:24:17,000 --> 00:24:22,000
Remember, the folks at the Burbank won't leave you out in the cold.

252
00:24:22,000 --> 00:24:26,000
Okay, are we ready to kick some coda?

253
00:24:26,000 --> 00:24:28,000
All right.

254
00:24:28,000 --> 00:24:33,000
All right, today's subject is parallel fifths.

255
00:24:33,000 --> 00:24:37,000
Now, we're talking about musical fifths here, not the other kind.

256
00:24:49,000 --> 00:24:54,000
You know what they say, he who laughs longest, laughs last,

257
00:24:54,000 --> 00:24:56,000
and therefore best.

258
00:24:56,000 --> 00:24:59,000
Okay, it's time to introduce our contestants,

259
00:24:59,000 --> 00:25:02,000
and as I say each of your names, contestants,

260
00:25:02,000 --> 00:25:07,000
please push the button on your individualized signal console there

261
00:25:07,000 --> 00:25:10,000
so the folks at home will know who's whom.

262
00:25:10,000 --> 00:25:15,000
On my far left, we have a gentleman who is a sophomore at Always High,

263
00:25:15,000 --> 00:25:18,000
Mr. Dennis Dweeb.

264
00:25:18,000 --> 00:25:26,000
In the middle, from Our Lady of Merciless Teasing, Miss Wilma Wallflower.

265
00:25:29,000 --> 00:25:33,000
And finally, a post-graduate student at the School of Hard Knocks,

266
00:25:33,000 --> 00:25:35,000
Mr. Murphy McNerde.

267
00:25:37,000 --> 00:25:40,000
Yes, sir, what a lineup.

268
00:25:40,000 --> 00:25:43,000
The best, or at least the brightest.

269
00:25:43,000 --> 00:25:47,000
And now, quiet everybody, here's our first musical excerpt.

270
00:25:47,000 --> 00:25:52,000
Contestants, when you hear the parallel fifths, let us hear from you.

271
00:25:52,000 --> 00:26:19,000
Here it comes.

272
00:26:19,000 --> 00:26:25,000
Woo hoo, Wilma Wallflower, you nailed that one.

273
00:26:25,000 --> 00:26:29,000
Parallel fifths between the first violins and the bass line

274
00:26:29,000 --> 00:26:31,000
in Mozart's Don Giovanni.

275
00:26:31,000 --> 00:26:37,000
Herbert, will you play that for us on the, whatever that thing is in front of you?

276
00:26:42,000 --> 00:26:48,000
Yeah, sounds very obvious with just those two parts, doesn't it?

277
00:26:48,000 --> 00:26:51,000
But with everything together, it's a different story.

278
00:26:51,000 --> 00:26:55,000
Let's hear it again, the way that naughty Wolfgang wrote it.

279
00:27:01,000 --> 00:27:02,000
Here it comes.

280
00:27:04,000 --> 00:27:08,000
Oh, the fifths add to the sighing quality, I think, right?

281
00:27:08,000 --> 00:27:13,000
I've got to hand it to you, Wilma, you've got x-ray ears.

282
00:27:13,000 --> 00:27:20,000
I could just hear Mozart now saying, well, excuse me.

283
00:27:20,000 --> 00:27:25,000
So that's 2,500 points for Wilma, and here comes our next excerpt.

284
00:27:25,000 --> 00:27:28,000
Prick up your ears, folks, this is a toughie.

285
00:27:28,000 --> 00:27:45,000
5,000 points for this puppy.

286
00:27:45,000 --> 00:27:51,000
Ah, ah, ah, ah, nobody, nobody heard that one, and I'm not surprised.

287
00:27:51,000 --> 00:27:55,000
That's from Beethoven's string quartet in E flat, Opus 74,

288
00:27:55,000 --> 00:28:01,000
and Herbert, would you play just the first violin and cello parts on that?

289
00:28:09,000 --> 00:28:11,000
That is hardly there, isn't it?

290
00:28:11,000 --> 00:28:16,000
Especially since that one violin note is so short.

291
00:28:16,000 --> 00:28:23,000
Well, it may not have bothered anyone here, but it has in the past bothered certain editors

292
00:28:23,000 --> 00:28:30,000
enough to make them change one of the notes in the cello part to avoid the parallel fifths.

293
00:28:30,000 --> 00:28:36,000
Well, excuse me.

294
00:28:36,000 --> 00:28:38,000
Okay, Ludwig.

295
00:28:38,000 --> 00:28:41,000
Personally, even though I'm no stickler in the mud,

296
00:28:41,000 --> 00:28:46,000
I think the changed cello part is quite plausible for other reasons, too.

297
00:28:46,000 --> 00:28:48,000
But hey, what do I know?

298
00:28:48,000 --> 00:28:52,000
I don't even approve of parallel parking.

299
00:28:52,000 --> 00:28:54,000
That's right, okay.

300
00:28:54,000 --> 00:28:56,000
Here we go, contestants.

301
00:28:56,000 --> 00:29:01,000
This is your last chance, and this one's worth 3,000 points.

302
00:29:01,000 --> 00:29:08,000
Now, Wilma's only got 2,500, so Dennis or Murphy could still win.

303
00:29:08,000 --> 00:29:37,000
Okay, let's roll excerpt number three.

304
00:29:37,000 --> 00:29:44,000
Oh, oh, oh, one, two, three.

305
00:29:44,000 --> 00:29:51,000
Everybody heard it, but Wilma was the first, so she did it, folks.

306
00:29:51,000 --> 00:29:54,000
Yes, she did it.

307
00:29:54,000 --> 00:29:56,000
That's right.

308
00:29:56,000 --> 00:29:58,000
Oh, okay, folks.

309
00:29:58,000 --> 00:30:01,000
Okay, okay, folks, before we announce the prize,

310
00:30:01,000 --> 00:30:15,000
Herbert, will you play that passage from Franck's symphony in D minor?

311
00:30:15,000 --> 00:30:17,000
Oh, hello.

312
00:30:17,000 --> 00:30:21,000
Excusez-moi.

313
00:30:21,000 --> 00:30:24,000
Yes, sir, they don't get any paralleler than that.

314
00:30:24,000 --> 00:30:30,000
Okay, Wilma Wallflower, you racked up 5,500 points,

315
00:30:30,000 --> 00:30:37,000
which means you've got a gift certificate worth $5.50

316
00:30:37,000 --> 00:30:41,000
at the boutique in the downtown Burbank.

317
00:30:41,000 --> 00:30:44,000
You could get yourself a plastic ATM card holder,

318
00:30:44,000 --> 00:30:52,000
or you could be well on your way towards the cost of a downtown Burbank tote bag.

319
00:30:52,000 --> 00:30:55,000
Murphy McNer, Dennis Dwee, thanks for joining us.

320
00:30:55,000 --> 00:30:57,000
And you too, everybody out there.

321
00:30:57,000 --> 00:31:03,000
Thanks for playing, well, excuse me.

322
00:31:03,000 --> 00:31:07,000
Be good now and don't do anything I wouldn't do.

323
00:31:07,000 --> 00:31:14,000
Ta-ta, see you on a wanted poster.

324
00:31:14,000 --> 00:31:17,000
Well, I don't know what it says on your wanted poster,

325
00:31:17,000 --> 00:31:28,000
but mine says Peter Shickely, host of Shickely Mix from PRI, Public Radio International.

326
00:31:28,000 --> 00:31:30,000
We're still playing by the rules here,

327
00:31:30,000 --> 00:31:35,000
and particularly the traditional rule against parallel fifths.

328
00:31:35,000 --> 00:31:41,000
The thing about 17th and 18th century composers is that they avoided parallel fifths, I think,

329
00:31:41,000 --> 00:31:46,000
because the interval of the fifth is the most consonant interval next to the octave.

330
00:31:46,000 --> 00:31:50,000
So parallel fifths are very close in feeling to parallel octaves.

331
00:31:50,000 --> 00:31:56,000
And also, because those guys didn't want to emphasize the interval of the fifth too much,

332
00:31:56,000 --> 00:32:00,000
except in certain limited circumstances, which we'll touch on later,

333
00:32:00,000 --> 00:32:05,000
they didn't much care for the sound of an open fifth.

334
00:32:05,000 --> 00:32:06,000
That's a fifth.

335
00:32:06,000 --> 00:32:12,000
Now, if I add the third in the middle,

336
00:32:12,000 --> 00:32:16,000
it's a triad, the basic building block of Baroque and classical music.

337
00:32:16,000 --> 00:32:21,000
But you rarely hear just the open fifth.

338
00:32:21,000 --> 00:32:25,000
Here's a bit of traditional Bach-like four-part harmony that I wrote.

339
00:32:25,000 --> 00:32:29,000
At one point, instead of triads, there's an open fifth,

340
00:32:29,000 --> 00:32:31,000
and I think you'll agree that it sticks out.

341
00:32:31,000 --> 00:32:35,000
It sounds unstylistic for the period.

342
00:32:35,000 --> 00:32:52,000
Right in the middle there, stuck out like a sore thumb.

343
00:32:52,000 --> 00:32:57,000
The rarity of open fifths in pre-20th century classical composition

344
00:32:57,000 --> 00:33:01,000
was brought home to me a few years ago when I heard a small city orchestra

345
00:33:01,000 --> 00:33:07,000
play the Brahms Second Symphony whose ending includes a huge D major triad

346
00:33:07,000 --> 00:33:32,000
blared out by the trombones.

347
00:33:32,000 --> 00:33:35,000
But at this performance the second trombonist,

348
00:33:35,000 --> 00:33:38,000
the one with the middle note, either didn't play

349
00:33:38,000 --> 00:33:41,000
or accidentally played the same note as one of the other trombonists,

350
00:33:41,000 --> 00:33:45,000
so instead of a full triad, we only heard an open fifth.

351
00:33:45,000 --> 00:33:59,000
It sounded like this.

352
00:33:59,000 --> 00:34:02,000
It just doesn't sound like Brahms with that open fifth,

353
00:34:02,000 --> 00:34:05,000
aside from the fact that it's being played on the authentic instrument.

354
00:34:05,000 --> 00:34:10,000
But there are several important exceptions to this avoidance of open fifths.

355
00:34:10,000 --> 00:34:14,000
One is when you want to use what was thought of as a rustic sound,

356
00:34:14,000 --> 00:34:19,000
the countryside association of open fifths stemming from the bagpipes,

357
00:34:19,000 --> 00:34:48,000
which were a peasant instrument.

358
00:34:48,000 --> 00:35:02,000
From Tchaikovsky's Violin Concerto, that was Heifetz playing the solo part.

359
00:35:02,000 --> 00:35:06,000
Another common use of open fifths also had rustic origins.

360
00:35:06,000 --> 00:35:10,000
Hunting horns couldn't play all the notes of the scale,

361
00:35:10,000 --> 00:35:15,000
so instead of writing this,

362
00:35:15,000 --> 00:35:26,000
which the lower horn couldn't play, composers did this.

363
00:35:26,000 --> 00:35:29,000
That's the open fifth.

364
00:35:29,000 --> 00:35:58,000
This became a very popular pattern.

365
00:35:58,000 --> 00:36:09,000
Part of Beethoven's eighth symphony.

366
00:36:09,000 --> 00:36:17,000
Now composers liked that figure so much that they used it even when writing for instruments that could play all the notes.

367
00:36:17,000 --> 00:36:41,000
Mozart's Divertamento for String Trio.

368
00:36:41,000 --> 00:36:48,000
And finally, there was one place in which open parallel fifths were often heard even though they weren't written,

369
00:36:48,000 --> 00:36:50,000
and that was in churches.

370
00:36:50,000 --> 00:36:54,000
Organs have a variety of stops or different tonal colors,

371
00:36:54,000 --> 00:36:57,000
each emphasizing a different combination of overtones,

372
00:36:57,000 --> 00:37:03,000
which are naturally produced tones that are heard in addition to the note played on the keyboard.

373
00:37:03,000 --> 00:37:11,000
And some of these stops accentuate to a quite striking degree the fifth step of the scale of the note.

374
00:37:11,000 --> 00:37:21,000
Bach wrote only one line at the beginning of the D minor toccata.

375
00:37:21,000 --> 00:37:31,000
But what you hear with certain stops is closer to this.

376
00:37:31,000 --> 00:37:34,000
The top note isn't that strong, but it's very strong.

377
00:37:34,000 --> 00:37:41,000
It's actually pretty amazing that composers who would bend over backwards to avoid parallel fifths in their writing

378
00:37:41,000 --> 00:37:46,000
would happily use organ stops that turned everything into parallel fifths.

379
00:37:46,000 --> 00:38:02,000
Bach's Divertamento

380
00:38:02,000 --> 00:38:24,000
Bach's Divertamento

381
00:38:24,000 --> 00:38:30,000
The beginning of Bach's toccata and fugue in D minor, played by André Isoir.

382
00:38:30,000 --> 00:38:34,000
Now with this organ registration, it's constant parallel fifths,

383
00:38:34,000 --> 00:38:37,000
but it's not like parallel fifths in part writing.

384
00:38:37,000 --> 00:38:42,000
That high overtone is not thought of as a separate voice, it's thought of as a color,

385
00:38:42,000 --> 00:38:49,000
just like the consistently parallel octaves in the violins at the beginning of Mozart's 40th symphony that we heard earlier.

386
00:38:49,000 --> 00:38:54,000
And again, as with octaves, things were very different before the high renaissance.

387
00:38:54,000 --> 00:39:00,000
There was a time when composers considered the triad too impure to use at the end of a piece.

388
00:39:00,000 --> 00:39:04,000
They would end only with octaves and or open fifths.

389
00:39:04,000 --> 00:39:09,000
And works with parallel fifths within the piece were perfectly respectable,

390
00:39:09,000 --> 00:39:13,000
nothing that had to be ordered in a plain brown wrapper.

391
00:39:13,000 --> 00:39:39,000
Bach's Divertamento

392
00:39:39,000 --> 00:40:03,000
Bach's Divertamento

393
00:40:03,000 --> 00:40:28,000
Bach's Divertamento

394
00:40:28,000 --> 00:40:39,000
Bach's Divertamento

395
00:40:39,000 --> 00:40:51,000
Bach's Divertamento

396
00:40:51,000 --> 00:41:12,000
Bach's Divertamento

397
00:41:12,000 --> 00:41:20,000
Bach's Divertamento

398
00:41:20,000 --> 00:41:31,000
Bach's Divertamento

399
00:41:31,000 --> 00:41:43,000
Bach's Divertamento

400
00:41:43,000 --> 00:42:06,000
Bach's Divertamento

401
00:42:06,000 --> 00:42:14,000
The beginning of Lan Hua Mei, Blue-Blossomed Plum, performed by the Tianjin Buddhist Music Ensemble.

402
00:42:14,000 --> 00:42:16,000
I love that music.

403
00:42:16,000 --> 00:42:24,000
Fifths are often used in movie scores and other program music to summon up or accompany oriental images.

404
00:42:24,000 --> 00:42:34,000
But as I said earlier, fifths are also used to signify exotically old, as in cavemen, or in this instance, ancient Rome.

405
00:42:34,000 --> 00:42:55,000
Bach's Divertamento

406
00:42:55,000 --> 00:43:16,000
Bach's Divertamento

407
00:43:16,000 --> 00:43:24,000
From Miklos Rosas score for the 1959 movie of Ben Hur, The Parade of the Charioteers.

408
00:43:24,000 --> 00:43:30,000
Now I was listening to some other movie scores and I've got a CD of music from the serials.

409
00:43:30,000 --> 00:43:36,000
I'm old enough to remember those one chapter a week movies that came on before the feature.

410
00:43:36,000 --> 00:43:41,000
And I'm looking on the back of the CD at the listing for Adventures of Red Ryder.

411
00:43:41,000 --> 00:43:45,000
And cut number five is called Little Beaver.

412
00:43:45,000 --> 00:43:51,000
So who's in that scene? Theodore Cleaver or a furry animal chewing on a tree?

413
00:43:51,000 --> 00:43:58,000
Well, about 13 seconds into the cue, the music tells you exactly who Little Beaver is.

414
00:44:21,000 --> 00:44:49,000
Bach's Divertamento

415
00:44:49,000 --> 00:44:57,000
Little Beaver, as William Lava's score makes clear by using repeated open fifths, is a kid from an Indian tribe.

416
00:44:57,000 --> 00:45:00,000
He's probably Red Ryder's sidekick.

417
00:45:00,000 --> 00:45:06,000
Now, you know, I'm no expert on traditional native North American music, but I've heard a fair amount of it.

418
00:45:06,000 --> 00:45:12,000
And I love it. And I have never, ever heard any open fifths in it.

419
00:45:12,000 --> 00:45:14,000
I mean, nothing even close.

420
00:45:14,000 --> 00:45:20,000
But to the movie composer, open fifths used to mean, in this case, primitive.

421
00:45:20,000 --> 00:45:29,000
People often describe the opening of Beethoven's Ninth Symphony as primordial, as if it's starting out at the beginning of the creation itself.

422
00:45:29,000 --> 00:45:37,000
And that feeling is undoubtedly partly due to the bare, stark, open fifth with which the symphony starts.

423
00:45:37,000 --> 00:45:49,000
As a matter of fact, this seems to me to be an extremely rare instance in the classical period of a prominent open fifth that doesn't seem to have any rustic connotation.

424
00:45:49,000 --> 00:45:54,000
No bagpipes or hunting horns here. Just the beginning of time.

425
00:45:54,000 --> 00:46:18,000
The.

426
00:46:18,000 --> 00:46:29,000
The.

427
00:46:29,000 --> 00:46:33,000
Beethoven's Ninth Symphony premiered in 1824.

428
00:46:33,000 --> 00:46:49,000
72 years later, Puccini's La Boheme was premiered freely and prominently employing parallel fifths, perhaps helping to suggest the beginning of the day and a freezingly cold day at that.

429
00:47:03,000 --> 00:47:31,000
The.

430
00:47:31,000 --> 00:47:45,000
The.

431
00:47:45,000 --> 00:47:53,000
The.

432
00:47:53,000 --> 00:48:08,000
The.

433
00:48:08,000 --> 00:48:16,000
The.

434
00:48:16,000 --> 00:48:27,000
The beginning of the third act of Puccini's La Boheme.

435
00:48:27,000 --> 00:48:31,000
He was criticized, by the way, for those parallel fifths.

436
00:48:31,000 --> 00:49:00,000
Here are some very open fifths. It's an octave and a fifth, actually, that perhaps helped to paint a picture of the vast expanses of the American West.

437
00:49:00,000 --> 00:49:13,000
The opening of Billy the Kid by Aaron Copland, one of my favorite pieces.

438
00:49:13,000 --> 00:49:16,000
I have a personal connection to that piece, actually.

439
00:49:16,000 --> 00:49:24,000
See, it's music for a ballet about Billy the Kid, and Billy the Kid was born in Brooklyn, and I used to live in Brooklyn.

440
00:49:24,000 --> 00:49:26,000
Small world, huh?

441
00:49:26,000 --> 00:49:36,000
Well, be that as it may, the traditional classical rule against parallel fifths is now as out of date as spittoons, powdered wigs, and shopping in stores.

442
00:49:36,000 --> 00:49:46,000
Here's a 20th century classic, and the four notes leading into the tune have to be the most famous parallel fifths in the world.

443
00:49:46,000 --> 00:50:12,000
The.

444
00:50:12,000 --> 00:50:31,000
The.

445
00:50:31,000 --> 00:50:57,000
The.

446
00:50:57,000 --> 00:51:24,000
The.

447
00:51:24,000 --> 00:51:44,000
The.

448
00:51:44,000 --> 00:52:11,000
The.

449
00:52:11,000 --> 00:52:18,000
Henry Mancini's theme for the Pink Panther, played by Eric Kunzel and the Cincinnati Pops Orchestra.

450
00:52:18,000 --> 00:52:32,000
Remember, the Pink Panther was a movie about a thief, and I think the hollowness of the fifths in those famous three pickup notes or four, if you want to count the downbeat, adds to the sneakiness of the music.

451
00:52:32,000 --> 00:52:42,000
Now, parallelism of any kind is anti-contrapuntal. That is, parallelism diminishes the individuality of the component voices.

452
00:52:42,000 --> 00:52:56,000
By the 20th century, composers felt free to use any chord in parallel fashion, which contributed to, or was the result of, depending on your view of history, the dissolution of traditional harmonic practice.

453
00:52:56,000 --> 00:53:07,000
In traditional harmonic practice, each chord has a harmonic function within the key. With parallelism, the chords are simply part of the color of the melodic line.

454
00:53:07,000 --> 00:53:12,000
It's a sensuous technique, and it led to some colorful music.

455
00:53:12,000 --> 00:53:18,000
We'll go out with Debussy, the Dances for Harp and String Orchestra from 1904.

456
00:53:18,000 --> 00:53:23,000
Bernard Heitink conducts the Royal Concertgebouw Orchestra with Vera Baddings on harp.

457
00:53:23,000 --> 00:53:33,000
The harp's very first entrance consists of parallel triads, and similar passages occur throughout the first of the two dances, the sacred dance.

458
00:53:33,000 --> 00:54:02,000
Hey, if you like the chord, why not give it the same freedom a melody has?

459
00:54:03,000 --> 00:54:32,000
...

460
00:54:32,000 --> 00:54:57,000
...

461
00:54:57,000 --> 00:55:22,000
...

462
00:55:22,000 --> 00:55:47,000
...

463
00:55:47,000 --> 00:56:12,000
...

464
00:56:12,000 --> 00:56:41,000
...

465
00:56:41,000 --> 00:57:08,000
...

466
00:57:08,000 --> 00:57:31,000
...

467
00:57:31,000 --> 00:57:56,000
And this is Peter Shickley saying goodbye and reminding you that it don't mean a thing if it ain't got that certain je ne sais quoi. You're looking good. See you next week.

468
00:57:56,000 --> 00:58:18,000
.

469
00:58:18,000 --> 00:58:26,000
...