Both of my sections are a complete waste of time. My PS TA and I are ideologically opposed. I can't wait to see what he gave my paper. I spent PS wondering why I woke up from my nap and Econ marveling at how badly I need a haircut (Friday). At least until the quiz, which I probably didn't do very well on, but I can't bring myself to care. As Sumana points out, beginning Econ is all based on the assumption that people behave rationally. I'd like to see how that applies to international politics. I have the same problem with all the theories in PS. When do people ever behave rationally, I'd like to know? So what is the point of making up theories when they will no doubt be proven wrong? The only one that I think is any good is institutionalism, and the is because the EU is the way to world peace. My TA, however, does not think this. Oh well, what does he know? Ok. I am now done complaining about school. For now.
IM from Jennie: can u see ur book now? :0
![[Comments]](/nb//themes/Default/comments.png "2 comments")
(2) Wed Oct 22 2003 17:24:
"I don't wanna be here. I wanna be around foreingers that I don't understand."--Aeby
- Comments:
Posted by Aeby at Thu Oct 23 2003 07:13
life is so much simpler when you don't understand things
Posted by Tonic at Thu Oct 23 2003 07:58
If people all of the sudden began to behave rationally, we'd all live in a less-sarcastic world.