I just realized that the Liar's Paradox could be embodied in a software
license. You'd have a license that met all the open source guidelines
but which said "This is not an open source license." (That's an Empirical Liar, by the way) Dan says that
this isn't a Liar Paradox, it's just lying. Maybe. But what would be
the legal status of such a license?
I guess it would only be a Liar's Paradox if the open source guidelines said that an open source license could contain no false statements.

![No comments [No comments]](/nb/assets/no-comments.png)
No comments yet.